Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />December 26, 1979 <br />45 <br />of the transactions that had occurred since this plat was first presented <br />to the Planning and Zoning Board on Feb. 21, 1979 up to the approval of this <br />plat by the Rice Creek Watershed Board on October 24, 1979, permit #79 -58. <br />Mr. Schumacher requested Mr. Gotwald to review the actions of the Rice <br />Creek Watershed Board. <br />Mr. Gotwald said the major concern was the run -off and also, the ability <br />of the soils to contain on -site septic systems. Mr, Gotwald discussed the <br />ponding area and the existence of a tile in the area. The current ponding <br />is 2.6 acres giving a storage of 5,3 acres, It is larger than needed. <br />Mr. Gotwald discussed the construction of this ponding area with the weirs <br />and erosions controls and the plans are so laid out as to conform to the <br />requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed Board. He emphaized that even in <br />a 100 year storm the volume of water run -off will not change due to the <br />construction and containment of this ponding area, <br />Mr. Gotwald said the City should request a stamped approved plan from the <br />Rice Creek Watershed Board. This could then be checked against the actual <br />construction. He said theexisting tile would not be disturbed. He was <br />asked if all the water from the streets would run into this ponding area and <br />Mr. Gotwald said that whatever runs toward that area now will continue to do <br />so, there will be no change in the direction of the water run -off. <br />He presented a map showing the tile now in that land and the fact that <br />there would not be a problem if this internal tile was disturbed, the main <br />line would not be altered and this is the one that would effect the adjoin- <br />ing property. <br />In regard to the on -site sewer systems and the water table, Mr. Gotwald had <br />marked up a map noting the types of soils in that area. Fine loamy sands <br />predominate with a water table of 6' adjacent to Peltier Drive - this is <br />a very narrow strip, To the East of this the water table is 2 -4'; and to <br />the East ofthis 2 -4'; in the center and the very Eastern 4 -5'. Mr. <br />Gotwald felt there is no problem with the percolation of the soils, the <br />problem is with the water table. 42 acres with 29 lots - the density is <br />approximately 1.5 acres per lot, only 6 lots facing 77th with frontage of <br />230' - this is not wide enough to be split in the future. <br />A detail plan must be submitted before the final plan can be approved. Mr, <br />Gotwald advised that a complete Engineering plan be a part of the final <br />plat and no building permits be issued until the holding pond is constructed. <br />This would affect all lots with the exception of the lots facing Peltier <br />Drive. All front yards should be 1J' above the street elevation. All lots <br />facing 77th street must have a minimum fill of 2' this would insure the <br />required distance from drain fields and water table, The perc tests would <br />be done after this fill is in place. These perc tests should be done by <br />a soils engineer. All these items should be a part of the developers <br />agreement and final plat. A part of the final plat must show all existing <br />drail tile to insure that no drain tile is cut off - they must be removed <br />or completely plugged. <br />Mr. Gotwald discussed the study asked for by the Council - if this deals <br />III with the possibility of polluting the lake - he felt that if the systems <br />are installed according to WPC40 there should be no problem. He felt a <br />study to include the area would be very expensive, He reoommended that <br />instead of the City getting involved, they should ask Engineers in this <br />business to give the City a quote on cost estimates and then determine <br />who is to pay for the study. <br />