My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/23/1981 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1981
>
02/23/1981 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2014 2:18:21 PM
Creation date
10/20/2014 1:47:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
02/23/1981
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
February 23, 1981 <br />Mr. Dokken said this will be a radio facility for the storage of a number of cables <br />that will increase the telephone capacity for this area. <br />There was discussion of the landscaping of the area - the driveway - the possibility <br />of conforming with the set back regulations. Mr. Dokken said that when they have <br />a survey done, they will also have contour maps done. <br />Mr. McLean moved to table this request until these maps are done and the Council has <br />more information. Seconded by Mr. Kulaszewicz. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. <br />Dokken will call the office when he has the information and will be put on the agenda. <br />Ostrom Variance Request. <br />This request is for permission to allow a garage to remain nearer the street than <br />the principle building. The garage had been constructed without a permit. Mr. <br />Ostrom said he did not know he needed a permit - he thought this was included in <br />the permit for construction of the home. <br />Mr. Short had reviewed this matter and had recommended that this provision in the <br />Ordinance be revoked and that garage be allowed nearer the street than the home. <br />The Planning and Zoning Board had recommended on a 4 to 1 vote that the Council amend <br />the Ordinance to allow this. <br />Mr. McLean felt that amending the Ordinance is not the answer to this - this is <br />piecemealing the Ordinance. <br />Mr. Jaworski questioned the owners as to why the building is where it is and Mrs. <br />Ostrom said that when they bought the lot they were told that a street would be <br />put in on the North line of the lot - so they built their home to face the North <br />and used Sunset - which is the West line - for an address. They built the garage <br />on the West side of the house also facing North. At the time they built, Leonard <br />was not in. Mr. Jaworski suggested they move their driveway from Sunset to Leonard <br />and this would eliminate the problem. <br />Or there is the alternative of using Leonard Street as their street address, thus <br />putting the garage on the other side of the home. <br />Mr. Jaworski moved not to change the ordinance. Seconded by Mrs. Elsenpeter. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br />Mr. McLean moved to send this request back to the Planning and Zoning for a recommen- <br />dation. Seconded by Mrs, Elsenpeter. Motion carried unanimously. <br />VFW - Variance Request. <br />This was for the transfer of a triangular parcel of land from the parcel to the North <br />of the VFW. Club to the Club property in order to put the, existing fence on the cor- <br />rect parcel of land. The property to the North'has been sold to a private party by <br />the VFW. Planning and Zoning had recommended approval of this variance with the <br />stipulation that the home be at least 10 feet from the lot line as proposed. <br />Mr. Johnson and Mr. Bohjanen represented the VFW and reported they had measured the <br />side yard setback and found it to be in excess of 11 feet. <br />Mrs. Elsenpeter moved to approve this variance. Seconded by Mr. McLean. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.