02/12/1990 Council Minutes (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1990 public hearing until a proposal is submitted. Council Member Bohjanen seconded the motion. On a roll call vote, motion carried with Council member Kuether abstaining. Mr. Schumacher explained that since there is no proposal for the property at the present time, it is uncertain when this matter would come back before the Council. However, at that time, another public hearing would be set and adjoining land owners would be notified. Council Member Reinert moved to deny the rezone as outlined in the Design Review Board application No. 89 -58. Council Member Bohjanen seconded the motion. On a roll call vote, motion carried with Council Member Kuether abstaining. CONSIDERATION OF 1990 PAY PLAN IMPLEMENTATION FOR NON -UNION EMPLOYEES Mr. Schumacher explained that the Council had adopted a Pay Equity Plan in September, 1989. The Council had also provided that this plan would be implemented over a two year period. This is the second year and those individuals who did not receive their full increase will be receiving the balance as of January 1, 1990 per Plan C. Mr. Schumacher explained that he has reviewed each employee and has prepared a summary sheet for each individual employee. Both documents have been submitted to the Council for their review. Mr. Schumacher recommended that the Council authorize a 4% cost of living adjustment and a 2% merit as recommended by himself. Council Member Bohjanen moved to approve Option No. 1. Council Member Kuether seconded the motion. On a roll call vote, motion carried with Council Member Neal voting no. Mr. Schumacher told the Council that the City is in full compliance with the Comparable Worth legislation at this time. The City has set a plan and has met its goals. PUBLIC HEARING - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR I35E CORRIDOR Mayor Bisel opened the public hearing at 7:47 P.M. Mayor Bisel explained that this hearing is continued from January 22, 1990 and noted the testimony was taken at that time and the hearing was continued to allow the citizens and the City Staff to meet and discuss the matter further. A counter proposal has been submitted by the citizens and was received in the office this past Friday. Mayor Bisel said that since the Council has not had sufficient time to review the proposal and since the proposal has not yet been considered by the Design Review Board, he recommended that this hearing be continued until everyone has had an opportunity to review