02/12/1990 Council Minutes (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 1990 it and the Design Review Board has had time to send a recommendation to the Council. Mrs. Sylvia Marier, 1801 77th Street - Mrs. Marier said that the Council now has the citizen input and asked why their proposal could not be acted upon this evening. Mayor Bisel explained that the Council could not act upon their proposal until the Design Review Board has reviewed the proposal and checked to see that it meets the City Code. He said everyone would be notified of the date the Design Review Board will consider the proposal. Dawn Marier Faymoville - Mrs. Faymoville explained that parts of Option No. 5 (citizens counter proposal) include parts of the City Planner's Option No. 2 and No. 3 proposal. She asked if this means that the City Planner did not go through this same process prior to submitting them to the citizen committee? Mayor Bisel said that this is not what this means. He noted that the Council could not adopt the City Planner's proposals or the citizens proposals until they were reviewed by the Design Review Board. Mrs. Faymoville asked that the dates for review of this matter be finalized. She indicated that the City Planner had talked to them on Saturday and indicated that the citizen proposal would go before the Design Review Board in March and then before the City Council on April 9, 1990. Mayor Bisel said this hearing would be continued until another date. Mrs. Faymoville asked if the fact that the proposal must go before the Design Review Board is in the City Charter. Mayor Bisel said yes. Council Member Reinert asked if the citizen group is in full concurrence with what has been presented to the City. He was told yes. Council Member Reinert suggested that the City Planner keep in contact with the citizen group and let them know how the proposal is progressing through each step. He also added that they be notified immediately is some part of the proposal cannot be done. Council Member Reinert also asked that the City Attorney be brought in on this matter and his opinion given to the Council. Council Member Neal told the citizen group that they should attend the meeting of the Design Review Board when this matter is considered. Mayor Bisel reminded the Council that the Design Review Board must consider the proposal using the current City Code and City policies. They cannot necessarily make a decision on how they feel about the matter. Council Member Reinert moved to continue the hearing to April 9, 1990. Council Member Bohjanen seconded the motion. On a roll call vote, motion carried unanimously. Mayor Bisel noted receipt of a letter from Mr. and Mrs. 1 1