Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />COUNCIL MINUTES <br />APRIL 9, 1990 <br />is using an open solid waste collection system which allows <br />multiple haulers to duplicate service on City streets. The <br />concerns raised by this system are deterioration of streets, <br />increased traffic which detracts from the safety and welfare <br />of the community and also makes regulation and reporting of <br />solid waste abatement programs difficult. Mr. Volk noted <br />that the study explores various organized collection option <br />and concludes with a recommendation for a solid waste <br />collection system. <br />The four waste abatement systems explored are <br />contract /franchise system, zoned system, municipal system and <br />contract options. Mr. Volk noted that an ordinance would be <br />required to address City authorization to enforce an <br />organized collection system, require citizens to have a solid <br />waste collection service as defined by the organized <br />collection system, require registration of solid waste <br />hauler(s), reinforce the requirement that City solid waste <br />haulers provide residential recycling services and would <br />contain an anti - scavenging clause to keep materials from <br />being taken from curbside. <br />Mr. Volk noted that Minnesota state law does not require <br />competitive bids for solid waste services. Contracts could <br />be awarded on the basis of negotiation, competitive bids or a <br />combination of negotiation and competitive bids. He also <br />explained that the SCORE bill passed in the fall of 1989 by <br />the state legislature requires a volume based fee system in <br />the contract for any city that licenses haulers. The purpose <br />of the volume based fee system is to encourage households to <br />recycle and reduce the amount of solid waste collected from <br />each household. <br />Mr. Volk recommended that the Council consider a zoned <br />organized collection system. This system would allow the <br />three major haulers in Lino Lakes the opportunity to continue <br />to service the same number of households while meeting the <br />objectives for organized collection. The City would be <br />divided into three zones and each hauler would have the <br />opportunity through a negotiated proposal bid to retain their <br />market share of the City. This would not guarantee that any <br />one zone would be awarded to any specific hauler should the <br />submitted proposals not be competitive. Haulers would <br />provide weekly recycling and also could provide yard waste <br />pickup for an additional charge to the resident. <br />Mr. Volk explained several methods of charging residents for <br />the sold waste abatement services. One method would be to <br />have the hauler bill each household. This would be very <br />convenient for the City staff in that it would reduce call to <br />the City and the hauler would handle any problems with <br />service. The drawback is that the City would loose the <br />public relations aspect of the service. A second method of <br />charging for the service is for the City to bill using a <br />