10/28/1975 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

OCTOBER 28, 1975 (Planner's comments continued) 4. (Con't.) Efforts should be made to combine the access to Sparkle Wash with the drive into Skyline Autobody. ENGINEER'S COMMENTS: 1. The plans do not fulfill the requirements of your ordinance for site and building plans. Since there is no topographical map or elevations, we cannot comment on site elevation, drainage and entrance locations. 2. The site sketch, as submitted, includes only lot length dimensions as originally platted. As you know, the State Highway Deptartment, has taken at least 75 feet of that frontage, therefore, the building set -back as shown is not correct. The parking areas as shown are in the Highway right -of -ways. 3. It would appear that the local and county inspectors need additional information on the amount of drain water to be disposed of into the septic system. The sketch shows a 12" commercial drain.._ 4. The slab and grade beam details appear to meet your code requirements, however, without detailed preliminary architectural plans and information on the condition and type of soil at the site, we cannot make any evaluations. Based on the above, we recommend that the requirements of your ordinance be fulfilled as to data that must be furnished to the City. (Complete copies of both letters are on file in the Clerk's Office.) Since these letters have been written, Sparkle Wash has provided a perc test, topographical maps and architectural plans. Mr. Yingling of Sparkle Wash said that they have a 30' abutting access to Skyline's access and the Mr. Ruud of the Anoka County Highway Depart- ment has okayed this access. Mr. Jaworski asked about screening they would be willing to put up and an estimated completion date of that project? Mr. Stenberg, of Sparkle Wash, felt that they could plant an evergreen screen with no problems and that it could be completed by next summer. It was suggested that the representatives of Sparkle Wash talk to the adjoining property owners and see what type of screening they would prefer and use that for the basis of the type of screening they install. The P &Z had recommended to the Council that this building be allowed pro- viding that the owners meet all recommendations of the Planner and Engineer and Mr. Jaworski so moved and added that they combine their access with Skyline Autobody. Seconded by Mr. Zelinka. Motion passed. The next item discussed at the P &Z was a request for a Variance to Ordinance No. 21 A presented by Mr. and Mrs. Richard Vomela. They are buying the home located at 830 Oak Lane. In its present location the home is less