My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/08/1975 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1975
>
10/08/1975 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2014 3:38:04 PM
Creation date
12/1/2014 1:39:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/08/1975
Council Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCTOBER 8, 1975 <br />This definition will be inserted in Article III, under Section 3.12 and <br />will be 'as provided by State Statute.' Ar <br />Article IX No objections, with additions. <br />Article X Mr. Marier questioned Section 10.3, what if the employee refused <br />to sign? What is the purpose of this section? Mr. Bastain <br />said it is to certify that the employee had received the notice <br />and had read it. If he refuses to acknowledge the receipt by <br />signature, this act should be noted on the report and witnessed. <br />Mr. Bastain said the report could also be sent by certified <br />mail, then he would have to sign for the letter. Mr. Wisenberger <br />noted that the contract reads 'shall sign'. He felt this <br />makes the signature mandatory. <br />Article XI No objections. <br />Article XII Hold. <br />Article XIII No objections - with the addition of Section 13.2 <br />Part -time employees will be reimbursed for court time at the <br />pay scale of their regular employment. <br />Article XIV This deals with call back time and does not deal with overtime <br />No objections. <br />Article XV <br />Articles XVI <br />SICK LEAVE <br />Article XVI <br />Article XVI <br />Mr. Marier felt this article could create a problem especially <br />during vacation time. Mr. Bastain says the classification <br />must be assigned by the Employer, the employee cannot assume <br />the position on his own. Mr. Zelinka asks if there were and <br />incidents in the Metro Area and Mr. Bastain said, No. <br />Mr. Wisenberger reiterated that this can only be done by <br />assignment by the employer, the employee cannot assume the <br />responsibility. there was discussion of requiring the <br />employee to work at the position for five days before being <br />paid the higher wage scale. Mr.Wisenberger felt that this <br />could create a situation whereby the employee works the five <br />days and on the sixth day is put back to the lower scale and <br />reassigned to the higher position on the seventh thus the <br />employer could avoid paying the higher salary. Mr. Marier <br />agreed he had a point, but felt this section could create <br />problems. Mr. Marier felt that an employee should work for <br />what he receives and earn his promotions. Article XV - Hold. <br />, XVII & XVIII - the Union submitted the following proposal: <br />12 days per year with an accumulation of 60 days with no <br />severance pay, Council asked to hold for consideration. <br />I. Hold by Union Request <br />11 Union asked for 9 holidays with double time and 2 for work <br />on a holiday. <br />Article XVII <br />Article XVII <br />The Union accepted the City's proposed vacation schedule for <br />this article. <br />I The City asked to hold on this article. <br />1 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.