My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/18/1991 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1991
>
04/18/1991 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2014 2:00:10 PM
Creation date
12/9/2014 1:01:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
04/18/1991
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
" 104 <br />COUNCIL WORK SESSION APRIL 18, 1991 <br />COUNCIL COMPENSATION <br />Mr. Schumacher presented a possible ordinance amendment regarding <br />Council compensation. He noted that when Council salaries were <br />established, the Council was holding just two (2) scheduled <br />meetings a month. At this time the Council is holding four (4) <br />or more scheduled meetings a month. The proposed ordinance <br />amendment would allow a per diem dollar amount for each meeting <br />over the two (2) required meetings each month. Vouchers would be <br />available at all eligible meetings. The vouchers would be <br />completed and given to payroll for payment. <br />Mayor Bisel suggested that Council salaries be tied to the cost <br />of living to avoid having to amend the ordinance each time a <br />salary increase is approved. It was noted that state statutes <br />probably prohibit this action. <br />Each Council Member was asked to suggest a dollar amount they <br />felt appropriate for salary for the additional council meetings. <br />This matter will be consider at another work session. <br />CARLSON /BAROTT PUD PROPOSAL <br />City Planner John Miller explained that action was taken at the <br />last Council meeting to deny a mixture of R -1 and R -1X homes for <br />PineRidge. Mr. Miller explained the background on why this area <br />was zoned R -1X and also explained the reasons that this zoning is <br />probably not appropriate for the area. He also explained that <br />the developer of PineRidge is considering purchasing the Barott <br />property and requesting that it also be developed with a mixture <br />of housing. Mr. Miller explained that the success of the <br />Reshanau Lake Trunk Sewer improvement depends on the Barott's and <br />Mr. Carlson agreeing to accept the assessment. <br />There was discussion regarding the reduction of quality and size <br />of homes in nearby subdivisions. <br />Mr. Miller outlined three (3) reasons the Council should consider <br />authorizing a mixture of housing for the Carlson and Barott <br />properties. The first reason is the park proposed for PineRidge. <br />Currently a temporary smaller park is proposed for PineRidge. <br />However, if Mr. Carlson is allowed to develop the Barott property <br />with mixed housing, the park will be permanently located so that <br />it can be enlarged when the Montain property is developed. The <br />second reason is the need for hook ups to help pay for the 1987 <br />temporary obligation bonds. The third reason is that if mixed <br />housing is not allowed the Barott's will not be able to sell <br />their property and will decline to accept their assessment for <br />the Reshanau Lake Trunk Sewer improvement. This probably means <br />PAGE 2 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.