Laserfiche WebLink
98 <br /> February 26, 1973 <br /> asked for the recommendations of the P&Z Board. <br /> Mr. Marier said the P&Z had a legal question as to the rezoning of the lands. He <br /> asked if publication and a Public heeri ng wasn't required for rezoning. <br /> Mr. Busch said our Ordinance reads that resoning is at the discretion of the <br /> Council ; that U. S. Lakes in entirely agreeable to the RI zoning asked for by <br /> the P&Z. He also questioned a Public hearing for rezoning. <br /> Mr. Locher said that a Public hearing is required by State Statues. The requirement <br /> is not included in the Village Ordinance because of this. We must comply with <br /> State Law on publication and hearing. <br /> Mr. Marier understood th i s to mean that we must wait for a Pub.l i c hearing on the <br /> rezoning before acting on the vacation of street and easements and the plat in <br /> the Lakes Addition #3. <br /> Mr. Busch replied that their applications were for variances. Part of the land <br /> in the plat was zoned Ag and Part R-4. The company is agreeable to rezoning to <br /> RI and he would urge the Counci I to approve the Plat in order for the company to <br /> finialize their sales program for the coming year. He said that approval of the <br /> s under r resent <br /> since RI is allowed in both area n <br /> plat is not dependent on rezoning in p <br /> zoning. He would hope the Council would continue this hearing on the platting and <br /> vacations of streets and easements at this meeting. <br /> Mr. Locher said that in order to rezone there must be notice of public hearing <br /> published 10 days prior to the hearing. Mr. McLean asked why this was not <br /> included in the package. Mr. Locher said it was an oversight. <br /> There was discussion on the usage of R4 zoning and RI zoning and what is allwoed <br /> in each zoning district. Mr. Busch was asked if they only plan single family <br /> homes in that area and he answered that they were. Mr. McLean said the purpose <br /> of the rezoning was to prevent any construction other than single family dwe I I i ngs. <br /> Mr. Jaworski asked if the plat could be approved as presented and the vacation <br /> of the streets and easements approved with the stipulation that the rezoning <br /> be approved at a leter date. <br /> Mr. Marier said if you approve the plat with out rezoning, then you shut the door <br /> to the people in the area who might object. <br /> Mr. Jaworski asked who was affected outside of the people in the area? He asked <br /> the acreage in the outlots that are being considered for rezoning. <br /> Mr. Busch said that outlot C has 9.5 acrea; outlot G has 14.8 acres, and Outlot I <br /> has 23.3 acres. <br /> Mr. Locher said pablication 10 days before the hearing is all that is nec essary <br /> for a hearing on the 26th of March. Mr. McLean suggested approveal of the plat <br /> and Vacations contingent upon rezoning inorder not to hold up construction of U. S. <br /> Lakes. Tkrere was a suggestion to hold the rezoning hearing on the 13th of March <br /> at a special hearing. Mr. Zelinka moved to set a special meeting for public <br /> hearing on the rezoning in Lakes Addition #3 for 8:00 P. M. , March 13, 1973. <br /> Seconded by Mr. Cardinal . Motion carried. <br />