My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/25/1974 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1974
>
02/25/1974 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2014 12:35:48 PM
Creation date
12/17/2014 9:30:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
02/25/1974
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
254 <br />February 25, 1974 <br />Mr. McLean moved to pass a Resolution to express the feeling of opposition of the <br />City Council to Senate File No. 2770 and House File No. 2904. This bill is in <br />direct conflict with the City Comprehensive Land Use Plan as approved by the <br />Metropolitan Council. The decision to issue building permits is the responsibility <br />of the governing body. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Mr. Marier reported Mr. Amundsen had appeared at the Planning and Zoning Board <br />with the request that the Village pay for his member ship fee to join the <br />Professional Building Inspector Group. Mr. Marier so moved. Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. <br />Motion carried. <br />Mr. Jaworski asked Mr. Locher if our Ordinance governing the storage of flamable <br />liquids covered all flamable materials? He said that he had spotted a 300 gallon <br />or so storage by a house. He thought that it was too close to the building. He <br />also asked if we required a permit for storage and if there was a fee? <br />Mr. Locher said the Ordinance covered all combustible materials, but there are no <br />provisions in the Ordinance for charging a fee. <br />Mayor Bohjanen felt that if there is a fee, there should be a form noting that <br />the party has paid a fee and has permission for the storage of flamable liquid. <br />Mr. Marier moved to charge a $10.00 fee for permission to store flamable liquid. <br />Seconded by Mr. Jaworski. Motion carried. <br />Mr. Marier moved to amend the motion to say "The $10.00 would only cover 500 <br />gallons. The additional fee would be $5.00 per 500 gallons." Seconded by Mr. McLean. <br />Motion carried. <br />Mr. McLean reported on the Park, Recreational and Enviornmental Commission meeting <br />held on February 18, 1974. There were five members present with two absent. The <br />rough draft of the Ordinance had been gone over. Mr. Jim McGeary had been elected <br />Chairman, Mr. Frank Resch as Vice- Chairman. Mr. Clausen and Mrs. Kendall had been <br />given the task of physical development recommendations for Sunrise Park; Mr. Kent <br />and Mr. Resch the Hall property; Mr. McGeray the Lino Park in conjunction with the <br />Lions Club. The long range overall plan, Mrs. Brission and Mrs. LeTourneau. The <br />plans for Sunrise and Hall property along with cost estimations should be finished <br />within six months in order to be availabel for budget meetings. The Lino Park <br />plans should be finished within sixty days so that bids can be let for work to be <br />done in the Spring. The long range plans should be done within a year. The next <br />meeting is scheduled for March 18, 1974. <br />Mr. McLean had discussed the Lino Park plans with Mr. McGrary and they agreed that <br />fencing is necessary. He asked if the Council would approve his requesting assis- <br />tance from Mr. Gotwald as to the specifications needed to let bids for this fencing. <br />The general consensus of the Council was this was allowed. <br />The patrol car bids were discussed and the letter from Chrysler Motors dealing with <br />the problems with the 1972 car that we now own. It was felt that the letter was very <br />vague and problems with the 1972 car that we now own. It was felt that the letter <br />was very vague and stated nothing. <br />Mr. Marier felt that we should have a record of our dealings with this company. <br />Mr. McLean would like clairfication from Barnett Chrysler /Plymouth covering the <br />problems with the 1972 Plymouth. There was a suggestion that we use this as a <br />leverage in whether or not the bid for the new car will be accepted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.