03/27/1972 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

3/27/72 215 had found that on July 1, 1971, a contract for deed to Dean & Sharon Miller was signed, and on August 4, 1971, a contract for deed to Byron and Nancy Undlin was signed. The split of the 230' parcel resulted in a 120' parcel for the Millers and a 110' parcel for the Undlins. Mr. Undlin had taken out a building permit last fall, but had not built. Mr. Locher said that the con- tracts have not been filed of record, but only on the Assessor's books. No variance had been granted. He suggested sending a letter to Lichtscheidl and inviting him to a meeting, noting in the letter that he cannot do this without a variance since the lots have neither 2 1/2 acres nor 150 feet of frontage. Mr. Locher said that the 230' parcel was pre - existing to Ord. 21A, and someone could have built on it. Mr. Marier asked when these had been entered on the books. Mr. Locher stated that this was on November 5th. Mr. Marier asked the Clerk where she had gotten the information on the split; she said it had been found when going over the building permits for 1971. Mr. Dupre stated that he had been giving permits for the lots along Main Street as Mr. Lichtscheidl had sold so many pieces. Mr. Marier felt that the letter should include that a X25 fee is needed also. He noted that no mortgage company would give a loan without a variance. Mr. Locher reported that Roy Backlin had raised a question on people moving snow out of their drivewaysonto the roadway. He said this was not a State offense unless it creates an obstruction. He had received sample ordinances from the League if we wanted to adopt a local ordinance which can regulate this. It would be a misdeameanor and we can bill them for the snow removal. Mr. Cardinal noted that some he had seen pushed the snow across the road but left trails. Mr. Jaworski thought we should look into this. Mr. Locher will send them out to the Clerk to make copies. Mr. Locher stated that Mr. Hutchinson had received a call claiming that someone was making a telephone study of sewer problems in the Village and wondered if this was from the Village or authorized. Mr. Marier thought we had a letter from someone on this. Mr. Locher had told Mr. Hutchinson that nothing was authorized from the Council. Mr. Bohjanen said nothing was authorized. It was noted we had received a letter from Mrs. Kedrowski on 4th Avenue. Mr. Locher noted that the real - estate broker who had called on the 20 acre parcel of Forrest Tagg's land didn't call back or appear at the P &? meeting. Mr. Locher had received a call from Roger Barnes on the shop he has across from the Trailer Park; he had not appeared at the P & &. Mr. Locher had material on the state sign code which °.vas dated March 6th, and had been filed with the Secretary of State. He had met with John McLean and representatives from Naegele and Brede on Thursday on this matter. Under the code ,e have a right to issue permits for signs in place on June 8, 1971, but we have no right to issue new permits for new signs after that date if they are not in a commerical or industrial area. The State will have to buy those that are not in such areas. Mr. Locher read through the rules governing certification of legitimate local zoning applicable to devices within legally zoned commercial or industrial areas. All certification shall apply to the then existingboundaries of the zoning authority and any further addition or elimination of land will be treated on an individual basis under the provision of the law. A copy of the minutes or procedure authorizing the zoning authority to request such certifi- cation from the Commissioner of Highways must be included. All certification