Laserfiche WebLink
204 <br />The hearing on a request for rezoning to commercial and a special use permit for <br />a trailer park for Gilbert Menkveld was called to order at 8:40 p.m. Mr. Locher <br />noted that a change was requested in the area to be rezoned to include the <br />entire tract. Mr. Locher then read the affidavits of mailing for this hearing <br />and noted that the affidavits of posting and publication had been previously <br />read and were on file. The. Clerk stated that she had same in the files. <br />Mr. Walters took the floor to present mock -up 10 -acre models of a plat of regular <br />houses and a mobile home park. He passed around samples of two pamphlets with <br />facts on mobile homes, and mentioned that any proposed legislation which.was adopted <br />in the 1971 session would probably not take effect until the middle of 1972 or 1973. <br />He stated that the advent of the 14 ft. wide trailers in Minnesota had made the older <br />models obsolete; also, thet50% of the trailers in Minnesota are outside of trailer <br />parks. Mr. Walters stated that his group as well as many other organizations were <br />asking for a standards code for the manufacture of trailers which would require a <br />third party inspection. <br />Mr. Walters then gave figures using national and state statistical averages, showing <br />that the 10 -acre plat of 24 residential homes based on a $21,000 value for combined <br />house and land would ultimately yield $16,700 in taxes, of which $11,690 would go <br />to the school district to support the 15 school age children from those homes. <br />From the mobile home court containing 60 units, based on a value of $8,000 per <br />unit plus $2,000 per lot value, the total tax revenue would be $22,820 with the <br />school's share at $12,820 for the same number of children. W. Walters mentioned <br />that the new housing plat would not yield these taxes until 1973 if built in 1971, <br />but the trailer taxes for half the units (providing the court were completely filled <br />in 2 years) would come back in 1971 and 100% in 1972. Mr. Walters also noted that <br />there would be continuing municipal cost to maintain streets and easements in the <br />housing plat but that the mobile home park owner must maintain his own streets. <br />Discussion on taxes, road easements, the license plates required for trailers and <br />the derivation of the number of children from trailer parks followed. <br />Mr. L'Allier had some questions for clarification: on using State statistics <br />rather than national; non- homestead tax base (only homestead if on State of Federal <br />leased land); the Class 2 personal property classification (Mr. Walters noted that <br />Class 2 refers to property on leased land); the change in taxes for mobile homes <br />if the new legislation is passed (Mr. Walters thought it might increase taxes <br />slightly). Mr. L'Allier asked what the purpose was for recommending changes in the <br />present law. Mr. Walters answered that, "today this is our law, but let's rewrite <br />it for agreement's sake." <br />After more discussion Mr. Jaworski noted that it won't gain anything if the trailers <br />won't, qualify as homestead under the new laws; Mr. Walters countered that they were <br />trying to put the trailer on an equitable basis, but it was up to the municipality <br />to set the taxes. Mr. Walters stated that his group was the prime mover behind the <br />League's proposal to get the mobile home into title law for chattel mortgages; <br />they have been doing a lot of research on taxing them equally with real estate. <br />! L'Allier asked whether the new law would cause more taxes to be gen.Qrated from <br />a mobile home than at present and if the mobile home would appreciate in value. <br />Mr. Walters stated that this depended on local policy and on wehther the trailer <br />owner added things such as a breezeway and garage. <br />Mr. L'Allier asked_ what prompted the action on the uniform code enforcement; Mr. <br />Walters replied that this was agreed upon on a national level. Self - policing <br />by the industry was necessary for a better quality of mobile homes. <br />