Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />Mr. L'Allier asked if the revision of the tax laws would make mobile home parks <br />more attractive to the municipalities; Mr. Walters stated that they would be no <br />more so than now, but he felt that they were attractive now. Mr. L'Allier then <br />asked why they were changing the tax structure; Mr. Walters stated that it was <br />for debt purposes only; the assessed valuation of the municipality would increase. <br />Mr. Summers took the floor to present figures of his own. He stated that a mobile <br />home park of 100 units of $8,000 value each would bring $26,332.80 in taxes using <br />the current mill rate of 263.33 (State), this giving $13,166.50 to the schools <br />and $7,899.84 to Lino Lakes. In addition, the assessed valuation of $28,000 would <br />bring $12,242 in real estate taxes, with $8,409.20 going to the schools and $1,800 <br />to Lino Lakes. The total then would be $21,575 to the schools and $9,700 to Lino <br />Lakes in 1971. <br />Mr. Summers stated that a Metro Council survey of 36 trailer parks (out of 72) <br />in the area had shown an average of .187 school age child per trailer or 5.3 <br />units per school age child. Thus, this 100 unit court would produce about 19 <br />school age children. Although they have agreed to adults only in Phase 1, the <br />school district would still receive from $1,000 to $1,100 for these non- existent <br />children. <br />Mr. Summers proceeded to give the depreciation schedule for mobile homes, stating <br />that the taxable value of a new trailer is 10% of its list price; this value <br />decreases 1 % /yr. until the taxes paid are the same as on a new trailer of $2,000 <br />list price, with the rate of decrease of 4 to 1, based on $10,000. Mr. Summers <br />noted that meanwhile the mill rate is going up sufficiently to nearly offset the <br />depreciation. Mr. Summers stated that it was unfair to assume that the whole park <br />would depreciate and drop in value as such because new trailers would be constantly <br />replacing older ones which are moving out. Because of this turnover, approximately <br />the same license fees would be collected with perhaps a slight increase and the under- <br />lying land value keeps going up. <br />Mr. Summers then presented figures showing that the total taxes on an $8,000 list <br />mobile home on a pad would be $362.42 whereas the taxes collected on an $8,000 <br />house would be $204.32 based on our current mill rate and the 30% deduction for sales <br />ism exemption. <br />Some disucssion followed on depreciation percentages of lower value trailers in <br />comparison, with persons in the audience purporting that more children are to be <br />found in trailers in this area than the averages used for the metro area. Mr. <br />Walters stated that the next subcommittee meeting on the proposed legislation would <br />be on October 16 in Room 18G of the Capitol Building. <br />Mr. Bohjanen moved to grant (as per his motion at the July 27 meeting) rezoning to <br />commercial (Ord. 6S) to Gilbert Menkveld and a special use permit for a mobile <br />home park providing that Mr. Menkveld's sewer plan meets with Pollution Control <br />Agency's recommendation and that he complies with our ordinances; also that he <br />indicate the age of the trailers to be accepted in the park at 7 to 10 years, <br />providing also that the trailers should look like new models when brought in; that <br />this be for Phase 1 of the plan only and that it be limited to school age children; <br />that Mr. Menkveld would hole the Village free and clear if there were any lawsuit <br />on this matter, also that the following variances to requirements be allowed: <br />1. The size of the lots would be 4,900 sq. ft. and 5,300 sq. ft. with a <br />density of 4.8 units per acre. <br />