Laserfiche WebLink
3t2 <br />COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 22, 1993 <br />the benefitting property objects to the assessment. There is <br />some potential that the courts may side with the landowner and <br />allow a reduced assessment. Mr. Hawkins said that General Fund <br />dollars cannot be used to fund any improvement project. However, <br />MSA funds or some other City fund established for such a problem <br />can be used. Council Member Bergeson asked that the staff <br />outline specifically where the additional funding would come from <br />in the event that the project cannot be fully assessed. Mr. <br />Schumacher noted that there are Tax Increment Financing funds <br />available as well as MSA funds. He explained that there are <br />dollars available to fully fund the project if necessary. <br />Council Member Elliott noted that this is not the first time <br />assessments have been contested and staff has always prepared a <br />contingency funding method. <br />Mayor Reinert felt that if the City Council is committed to the <br />improvement project, the City Council must move forward at this <br />time. He noted that there will be a tax benefit and the safety <br />aspect is of great concern. <br />Council Member Neal moved to adopt Resolution No. 91 - 93 <br />Ordering Plans and Specifications for the Lake Drive (County Road <br />#23) and Highway #49 Intersection improvement. Council Member <br />Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Council Member Bergeson asked that Mr. Schumacher prepare a <br />report outlining the potential funding for this improvement in <br />the event that assessments fall short of the amount required to <br />complete the improvement. <br />Resolution No. 91 - 93 can be found at the end of these minutes. <br />ATTORNEY'S REPORT <br />Mr. Hawkins did not have a report. <br />OLD BUSINESS <br />There was no old business. <br />NEW BUSINESS <br />Resolution No. 90 - 93 Amending the 1993 General Fund Budget - <br />Mr. Schumacher explained that the auditors have recommended that <br />the General Fund budget be amend to reflect the figures that are <br />closer to the actual amounts. He noted that questions may be <br />raised at the Truth in Taxation hearing regarding comparing <br />certain figures to the proposed 1994 General Fund Budget <br />therefore, it would be most appropriate to have the 1993 General <br />PAGE 10 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />