My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/09/1996 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1996
>
10/09/1996 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2015 1:45:51 PM
Creation date
1/27/2015 1:34:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/09/1996
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL WORK SESSION OCTOBER 9,1996 <br />Mr. Workman noted the second biggest concern for Lino Lakes is safety. He suggested <br />that the City conduct weekly training to make haulers more aware of the concerns and <br />what could be done to eliminate some of them. <br />Council discussed Mr. Workman's suggestions and asked Ms. Constant to keep the <br />Council updated on this matter. <br />AMENDING THE SEWER AND WATER ORDINANCE, MARY VASKE <br />Currently, the City Code requires that if a septic system or a well fails, the home is <br />required to connect to the City sewer or water utility if these services are available. This <br />requirement may put a financial burden on the homeowner since they will be required to <br />connect to the utility service that the do not need. Staff presented the following proposal: <br />The City would require that the homeowner connect to both the sewer and <br />the water utility if either the septic system or the well fails. ssment <br />would be calculated but the assessment for the service - i of n ded <br />would be deferred for five (5) years or some other ti . e • 1 y the <br />City Council. This requirement would allow the a ave money <br />for the future assessment and would give the +ett eking system <br />since the future assessment would be f u • unty. <br />Council discussed the advantages and <br />discuss this matter at the next wor <br />directed to Mr. Wessel or Ms. <br />CITY AUCTION, TO <br />Mr. DeWolfe expl <br />Hennepin County a <br />auction to sell these <br />the proposal and decided to <br />questions about this matter should be <br />next meeting. <br />could not get the out -of -service City vehicles on the <br />n in previous years. He recommended that the City hold an <br />hicles along with other City owned items such as computers and <br />Police Department confiscated vehicles. <br />The profits from the sale of drug related confiscated vehicles must be used for drug <br />related programs. All other proceeds of the auction would go into the General Fund. <br />Mr. DeWolfe will begin preparation for an auction. <br />LEESE SEPTIC SYSTEM: HISTORY - PETER KLUEGEL <br />Council was given a copy of a letter from the Leese' objecting to the proposed assessment <br />to connect to the City utilities. The Leese" septic system is failing and they are <br />contending that the City is at fault for allowing the home and the inadequate septic system <br />to be constructed on an unbuildable lot. In addition, the Minnesota Pollution Control <br />PAGE 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.