Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 14, 1996 <br />Council Member Kuether moved to adopt Resolution No. 96 - 132, as presented. Council <br />Member Lyden seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Resolution No. 96 - 132 can be found at the end of these minutes. <br />Resolution No. 96 - 133, Adopting Assessment, Lino Air Park North - Mr. Ahrens explained <br />that this project is an extension of Carl Street located on lots 10 through 14 of Lino Air Park <br />North on the south side of Carl Street. Assessment is based on the following: <br />Surface water management planning fees for sewer and water management <br />The total assessment amount is $16,132.25. <br />Mayor Landers opened the public hearing at 7:48 P.M. <br />Tom Schmelzer, 398 Carl Street, requested clarification of the assessment charges, and whether <br />or not this assessment is against the developed lots or Lino Air Park North as a whole. Mr. <br />Ahrens explained that the assessment is just for the developed lots, and that the charges are to <br />cover storm sewers, ditch cleaning, etc. which occur with developments included in the project <br />area. <br />Carl Johnson, Lot 11, asked if any of the assessment would be charged to individual lots. Mr. <br />Ahrens explained that each lot would receive an assessment, paid by the developer. <br />Clayton Wendt, 391 Thomas Street, asked about drainage work done in the Air Park area; <br />specifically, what notification was required to the Air Park Association as well as to area <br />residents. Additionally, he asked about an easement for the ponding installed on Air Park <br />property. Mr. Ahrens was unable to respond to the question regarding notification requirements. <br />He did state that for development purposes it was necessary to re-route Carl Street. With respect <br />to the ponding, the RCWD required the ponding for the same purposes, and was of the opinion <br />that proper easements were obtained. Mr. Ahrens offered to work with Mr. Wendt to resolve the <br />easement issue. <br />There being no further input, Council Member Kuether moved to close the public hearing at 7:58 <br />P.M. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Council Member Kuether asked Mr. Hawkins if there was any problem in going ahead with <br />adoption of the assessment resolution in light of Mr. Wendt's questions. Mr. Hawkins indicated <br />that the resolution should go forward, but that permits should not be issued until drainage issues <br />are thoroughly investigated. <br />Council Member Lyden asked if the lots would be buildable if the ponds were contained entirely <br />within each one. Mr. Ahrens could not respond without further evaluation of the properties <br />involved. <br />Council Member Lyden moved to table consideration of Resolution No. 96-133. Council <br />Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />8 <br />