Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 23, 1997 <br />Council Member Kuether asked if property owners will only be assessed $2,000, at this time, and <br />then, in the future when they connect, they would pay the connection fee. Mr. Ahrens stated this <br />is correct and until the MUSA is extended the resident is required to prove need to connect. He <br />noted a hook up ordinance is also being considered tonight which allows a seven year period of <br />time between utility connections. <br />Council Member Bergeson inquired regarding the proposed assessment for sewer and water <br />improvements. Mr. Ahrens advised it includes area unit charges and estimated construction <br />costs. He also explained how this rate will be adjusted to the current area unit charge at the time <br />connection is made. Mr. Ahrens estimated that cost will probably increase by 2% to 4% per year. <br />Mayor Landers opened the public hearing at 6:55 P.M. <br />Tom Drow, 6317 Red Maple Lane, stated an ordinance exists saying if sewer is available and <br />septic fails, residents are required to connect. He asserted the City will require residents to <br />connect if their system fails. Mayor Landers explained the properties outside the MUSA cannot <br />connect unless the resident can prove their system is failing. Mr. Drow stated it sounds like the <br />Council is saying residents never have to connect. Council Member Kuether stated this is true <br />only if the system never fails. <br />Vivian Hanson stated she owns five acres between Hodgson and Ware Roads which is wetland <br />along Ware Road. Therefore, she questioned why she would be assessed since they will never be <br />able to connect to it. Mr. Ahrens explained the assessments are based on access to roadway and <br />if the frontage on Ware Road is wetland, the resident would not be able to develop so the City <br />would not be able to assess. With regard to the utility assessment, the property owner may or <br />may not be able to connect. If a future house cannot be constructed, then that assessment would <br />not apply either. <br />Ms. Hanson stated she would like build on Ware Road if that was possible. However, it is not <br />possible. <br />Clyde Rehbein stated he owns the property on the west side of Ware Road near the intersection <br />of 62nd Avenue. He explained they had a wetland delineation done several years ago because <br />they installed a sewer line to the Fox Trace development and spent considerable expense to <br />assure it was deep enough to serve that property, and the Lehman and Hanson properties. <br />Therefore, the proposed sewer on Ware Road is of no benefit to him. He commented on the <br />Hanson and Lehman wetlands and stated he sees no possibility there will ever be a driveway <br />from those properties onto Ware Road. <br />Mr. Rehbein asked if they will ever be assessed for the sewer on Ware Road if he develops the <br />Hanson and Lehman properties and connect to their internal utility system and never connects to <br />Ware Road utility system. He also asked if the intent is to levy the proposed assessments now or <br />at a future date. Mr. Ahrens explained the City would like to install utilities prior to the roadway <br />reconstruction. The proposal is that assessments be levied on the lots Mr. Rehbein is discussing <br />since a development plan has not been submitted for Council consideration. Mr. Ahrens <br />indicated if those properties do not connect to the Ware Road improvements and Mr. Rehbein <br />installs his own service lines, he would not be assessed for the Ware Road improvements. <br />However. if a lot fronts on Ware Road. the proposed assessment stands. <br />