Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 23, 1997 <br />Mr. Ahrens again explained the process allowed for property owners to petition for or against the <br />project. He added the City cannot assess for sewer and water utilities if the property is outside of <br />the MUSA. Based on the Charter and lack of MUSA, some of the properties cannot connect <br />immediately so they cannot be assessed immediately. <br />Mr. Rehbein stated he understands the developer should heavily contribute towards the cost to <br />reconstruct Ware Road but he believes his project has already helped reduce Ware Road traffic <br />since it is being used as a shortcut to Hodgson Road. <br />Council Member Bergeson asked if Fox Trace was assessed for trail. Mr. Rehbein advised he <br />built the trail from Ware Road to Hodgson Road. Mr. Ahrens noted staff proposes to locate the <br />new trail on the east side so the trail, in its current location, would not be utilized. <br />Mr. Rehbein stated the Parks Committee has strongly supported trails but, as a developer, he <br />feels strongly that they should be placed by the streets and not located behind properties. He <br />reported the unsold Fox Trace lots abut the trail and said he believes the community will regret <br />construction of the trails due to poor access and nuisance activities. Mr. Rehbein suggested that <br />locating trails by the roadway means they are better lit and safer for use. <br />Bill Greger, 6353 Ware Road, stated he believes the developments abutting Ware Road have <br />caused the problem and that the walkway will not be predominately used by the residents <br />abutting Ware Road. Therefore, he does not believe the property owners along Ware Road <br />should bear all the cost but the cost should be spread among all taxpayers. He stated his opinion <br />that the road should be as narrow as possible without parking allowed. Mr. Greger stated the <br />original layout presented does not match the stakes currently posted. He asked if the proposed <br />assessment is based on the current number of homes or the number of homes based on full <br />development. Mr. Murphy advised there is room for an additional 30 lots fronting on Ware Road <br />and the assessment is based on full development. <br />Mr. Greger again asked how many lots the assessment is based on (existing number or potential <br />number once fully developed). Mr. Ahrens advised it is based on staffs opinion of property <br />value increase. He noted the City's assessment policy is $45 per front foot but it is staffs opinion <br />that is questionable if related to increased value to the property. Therefore, staff recommends <br />$28 to $29 per front foot for the street improvement. With the sewer assessment, staff took the <br />construction cost and divided it by the total maximum number of lots which results in the per lot <br />assessment rate. <br />Mr. Greger asked if this assessment range is typical to other areas. Mr. Ahrens stated this is a <br />reasonable assessment and equals the market value increase. <br />Mr. Ahrens explained it is proposed to fund the trails from State Aid which is comprised of <br />gasoline tax that is shared by everyone. With regard to street width, he explained the area where <br />parking is not proposed. the street width will be reduced by four (4) feet. <br />• <br />Mary Altstatt. 6134 Ware Road. objected to being assessed for the reconstruction of the roadwayill <br />and asked why it is not designated as a private roadway if residents arc expected to pay for its <br />reconstruction. Mr. Ahrens explained the City has the ability to do improvement projects and <br />4 <br />