My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/23/1997 Council Minutes (2)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1997
>
06/23/1997 Council Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2015 3:54:12 PM
Creation date
1/30/2015 10:17:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
06/23/1997
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 23, 1997 <br />assess based on property value increase. He stated in this case, the City believes there will be at <br />least a $2,000 increase to property values. Mr. Ahrens pointed out the vast majority of funding, <br />about 90%, is coming from State Aid funds and the remaining 10% from assessment to Miller's <br />South Glen and abutting property owners. <br />Ms. Altstatt stated she thinks it is strange that the developer of Miller's South Glen offered to pay <br />$2,000 per proposed lot and now abutting Ware Road residents are being assessed the same <br />amount. Mr. Ahrens explained it was thought they should be the same amount. <br />Mayor Landers commented on the impact to the assessment if the developer of Miller's South <br />Glen had not volunteered to donate $2,000.00 per each lot towards the project. <br />Marvin La Valle, representing 330 Birch Street which contains 1320 feet of frontage on the west <br />side of Ware Road, stated he understands that as the property develops in the future, they will <br />probably be charged $2,000 per new lot. He stated he supports this assessment and believes it is <br />a good deal since it includes a new street, storm sewer, and trail. He commended City Staff for <br />their work on this project, stated he has no objection, and urged the Council to proceed. Mr. <br />La Valle noted the need to do more work on the ponding issue. <br />Mayor Landers asked if the proposed $2,000 assessment for the roadway will remain at $2,000 <br />for future lots. Mr. Ahrens stated it will increase as inflation increases but will not exceed the <br />benefit to the property. <br />There being no further public input, Mayor Landers requested a motion to close the public <br />hearing. <br />Council Member Kuether moved to close the public hearing at 7:20 P.M. Council Member Neal <br />seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Council Member Bergeson explained that the next 60 days includes the comment period for <br />residents to provide input. <br />At the request of Mayor Landers, Mr. Ahrens reviewed the time schedule for this project. <br />PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD REPORT, MARY KAY WYLAND <br />Consideration of Site Plan Review, Boe Ornamental, 484 Lilac Street - Ms. Wyland <br />explained that Boe Ornamental is requesting a site plan review to allow the construction of a <br />24,398 square foot office/warehouse/manufacturing building containing 6,376 square feet of two- <br />story office space and 18,002 square feet for warehousing and manufacturing. The property is <br />located on the south side of Lilac Street just west of 484 Lilac and the existing Boe Ornamental <br />Building. The City is currently working on a feasibility report concerning the extension of sewer <br />and water utilities down Lilac Street in this location. If utilities are not extended the proposed <br />Boe Ornamental construction will most likely be delayed. Nits. Wyland noted the property is <br />zoned General Industrial and located immediately north of the Apollo Business Park. The parcel <br />is indicated as industrial in both the existing and proposed City Land Use Plan. The site contains <br />approximately 1.44 acres which includes a portion or the recently vacated Industrial Boulevard. <br />It was vacated in the anticipation of this request and with the understanding that the future <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.