My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07/28/1997 Council Minutes (2)
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1997
>
07/28/1997 Council Minutes (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2015 3:51:35 PM
Creation date
1/30/2015 10:36:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
07/28/1997
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 28, 1997 <br />Council Member Kuether stated that information had previously been provided at a Charter Commission meeting <br />indicating the estimated percentage of increase to property value following street improvement is 25%. Mr. Ahrens <br />agreed that 20% to 30% is the norm. Council Member Kuether added that even if the increase in property value was <br />not equal to the amount of the assessment, allowing the streets to remain in a state of disrepair and continue to <br />deteriorate would only detract from property values. <br />John Perin requested clarification as to why the property at the north end of Black Duck Drive is not being assessed. <br />Mr. Ahrens reiterated that according to the preliminary study, that area was not in need of street reconstruction. Mr. <br />Perin also expressed concern about increased traffic speed with better streets, stating that rough roads cause vehicles <br />to travel more slowly. <br />Council Member Kuether responded that poor road conditions also inhibit efficient emergency service. <br />Mayor Landers pointed out that the City does not set speed limits; they are determined by the State and County. <br />There being no further public input, Mayor Landers called for a motion to close the public hearing. Council Member <br />Kuether moved to close the public hearing at 7:25 P.M. Council Member Bergeson seconded the motion. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br />Mr. Ahrens reminded everyone about the petition process, stating that there is a 60 -day waiting period within which <br />property owners may petition against the project. Mayor Landers clarified the process for petitioning would require <br />only one petition, a legal document containing signatures, for the entire project. <br />6:30 P.M. - PUBLIC HEARING, LILAC STREET TO LAKE DRIVE AND LAKE DRIVE <br />BEGINNING AT I35W NORTH TO MAIN STREET TRUNK UTILITIES <br />• IMPROVEMENT, DAVID AHRENS <br />Mr. Ahrens suggested that although the study in preparation for this project has thus far focused on the area to the <br />end of 79th Street, the study should be amended to include property along Lake Drive to Main Street. He then <br />reviewed with Council its acceptance of the feasibility report based on the study of extension of trunk utilities along <br />Lake Drive from Lilac Street to 79th Street. Last Fall a developer indicated interest in property off the end of 79th <br />Street. The project, if ordered, will serve numerous businesses and residences along Lake Drive and provide a trunk <br />system to branch from to serve other property in the area. This project will also serve the proposed Highland <br />Meadows residential project that is going before the Planning and Zoning Board in August. Two neighborhood <br />meetings have been held as well as a survey of property owners to determine interest in the trunk utilities. Mr. <br />Ahrens also stated that he has completed a survey of the property owners to determine interest in the project, with a <br />33% response. A number of commercial property owners as well as Forest Lake School District officials expressed <br />positive interest in the project going forward. <br />According to Mr. Ahrens, the Bisel Amendment plays a pivotal role in the proposed assessment for this project. He <br />used the example of a residential lot which would otherwise be assessed approximately $18,800 for sewer and water <br />service. Under the Bisel Amendment the assessment would be about $8,800, for a $10,000 difference. The <br />assessment per lot for this project under the Bisel Amendment would be approximately $1,000 per year for 15 years, <br />and would be $2,100 per year without the Bisel Amendment. <br />Mr. Ahrens explained that the City Charter provisions apply to this entire project area. Therefore, the 60 -day waiting <br />period following close of the public hearing on this project, property owners will have the opportunity to petition <br />against it going forward. <br />• <br />With respect to the condition of the present septic systems, Mr. Ahrens stated the City's Building Inspector <br />conducted a review indicating approximately 130 repairs or redesigns during the past 17 years along the Lake Drive <br />corridor. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.