Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 28, 1997 <br />Mr. Ahrens pointed out that a portion of the property along the proposed improvement route lie outside MUSA <br />boundaries, which cannot be assessed. However, these property owners have been notified of the project. <br />Council Member Kuether asked if those residents outside the MUSA area would be afforded use of the new services <br />should they have a septic system failure. Mr. Ahrens explained that anyone outside the MUSA boundary requiring <br />service under emergency circumstances could connect to the new utilities. He also reminded Council that after the <br />new system is installed adjacent property owners could connect at their convenience, pointing out that a recent City <br />ordinance allows for connection to one utility at a time with a 7 -year grace period between connections. <br />Mr. Hahn reviewed the various routing possibilities for this project, as follows: Alternate A provides for a 21" <br />sewer along Lake Drive to 79th Street and on to the proposed development. Alternate A revised provides for the <br />addition of lateral services. Alternate B provides for a 21" sewer from Apollo Drive and Lilac Street across open <br />field to 77th Street and Lake Drive through an easement to the proposed development. Alternate C provides for a <br />21" sewer from Apollo Drive and Lilac Street across open field to 77th Street and Marilyn Drive. Alternate D is <br />very similar to Alternate C, with the exception of the routing of the proposed roadway near Lilac Street. Alternate E <br />provides for a 21" sewer from Apollo Drive and Lilac Street across open fields into the development. According to <br />Mr. Hahn, the most desirable option is Alternate A, which would provide trunk service only and ultimately the most <br />extensive service to the area. <br />Mr. Hahn explained that the proposed routing of the new sewer lines is based upon avoiding disruption of trees in the <br />area. <br />He further explained that the proposed project does not include a storm system. He also stated that installation of the <br />new system would be at minimal disturbance to existing streets and roadways. <br />Mr. Hahn reviewed the proposed schedule for the project, as follows: <br />Public Hearing <br />60 -day Waiting Period Ends <br />Order Improvement and <br />Plans and Specifications <br />Approve Plans and Specifications <br />Open Bids <br />Award Contract <br />Construction Start <br />Construction End <br />July 28, 1997 <br />September 26, 1997 <br />October 13, 1997 <br />January 12, 1998 <br />February 19, 1998 <br />February 23, 1998 <br />May, 1998 <br />October, 1998 <br />Mr. Hahn stated that the project has been determined feasible, will benefit adjacent properties, can be extended to <br />the developing properties consistent with the City's comprehensive plan, and he recommends going forward pursuant <br />to the terms of Alternate A. <br />With respect to assessment, Mr. Hahn reviewed the project's total cost as being approximately $1,827,914, <br />consisting of trunk sewer area charges of $217,773; trunk sewer connection charges of $152,043; trunk water main <br />area charge of $197,375; trunk water main connection charges of $256,595; lateral sanitary charges of $370,566; <br />later water main charges of $22,769; surface water management planning, Type 1 of $194,480; Type 2 of $80,265; <br />Type 3 of $336,046. Parcels were only considered for assessment if the service would be adjacent to the property. <br />Mr. Hahn reviewed the project's cost summary, as follows: Trunk sanitary sewer, $1,086,800; trunk water main, <br />$535,100; property acquisition, $229,200; total estimated cost, $1,851,100. Funding sources were summarized as <br />follows: City funds (area and unit), $634,000; development - lateral, $173,100; development - area and unit, <br />$515,100; property owners - lateral, $220,200; property owners - area and unit, $308,700; total, $1,851,100. He <br />explained that the assessments amount to 30% of the cost being borne by the City, 25% by residents, and the balance <br />by the developer. <br />Mayor Landers opened the public hearing at 8:11 P.M. <br />7 <br />