10/11/1999 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 11, 1999 wetland. A new plat drawing must be submitted. (The City has received no reduced plat drawing for inclusion in this report). Title Commitment: The City Attorney has reviewed submitted title information. Two (2) signatures must be added to the signature page or those signatories' interests released. The signature page must be amended and resubmitted or the releases submitted for the City Attorney's review. Developer's Agreement: The City does not have a complete developer's agreement, the contract required to ensure that the developer completes necessary work. At the applicant's request, the City has submitted to the applicant a modified version of the standard developer's agreement, which the City Engineer and City Attorney have reviewed and the City's interests are protected. The applicant has not agreed with the standard language or the amended language. An important part of the agreement is the financial securities section. The developer posts letters of credit to cover the cost of the improvements. If the work is not complete correctly, the city can draw on the letter of credit to complete or correct the work. The City has received no financial securities from the developer. Conditions of Approval: As is often the case, the City approve conditions. Many conditions of approval relate to the McDo apply to the plat include City Engineer and Rice Creek and drainage, and obtaining necessary approvals f Department of Transportation. plat with Conditions that ct approvals of grading my and the Minnesota Staff spoke with the Rice Creek Wate s e`: onn'bctober 6, 1999. The last entry in their file shows that the review was tab , 1 ' 99, pending additional information to address several outstanding issues. T had 5 days to submit the information. Their file shows no additional inform. d. MnDOT does not nee contractor, and as far o drainage at this time. The County will issue a permit to the y knows, the County is ready to do so. One condition stated that five (5) -parking spaces should be eliminated on the front of the building. The latest site plan shows two (2) handicapped spaced remaining there. The City has received no explanation why this condition was not met. This can be addressed before the building permit is issued. Likewise, a lighting plan (photometry) should be submitted before a building permit is issued. To reiterate for the record, the submittal for the PDO and preliminary plat included numerous drawings. However, the City approved four (4) and are as follows: C-5, C-6, C-8, and 4/10. Staff reported the drawings were included in the April 26, 1999, Council report. The other drawings included drainage, utilities, and a concept plan for areas outside of the area to be platted. Therefore, these other plans were not approved. Staff recommended approval of the preliminary plat based on the information included in the report in order to keep the project moving on the City's end. 4