08/14/2000 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 14, 2000 Council Member Carlson stated a lot of work has been put into the document by staff and the Planning and Zoning Board. She stated she has remaining issues that she would like to discuss at the next Council work session. Council Member Reinert moved to continue Town Center Development Standards Endorsement to the August 28, 2000, Council meeting. Council Member Dahl seconded the motion. Council Member Carlson expressed the following concerns regarding the standards: 1. Putting standards on property the City does not own. The City has been negotiating with property owners for the past 2-1/2 years. She stated she would like to hear from the property owners again regarding their opinion of the standards. The area has prime commercial property and the application showed 18.3 acres of housing on that property. The grant money of $1.5 million sounds like a lot o one However, the City has put a lot of money into the project. She stated s w�A, det� is on financing and if the grant will be enough to leverage the project. e s ed;- does not want to go to the taxpayers. 3. Extending Apollo as an "L" and putt relating to traffic hours. on '�7`h Street needs more discussion 4. Having a service station foo • x o� A p.11o Drive. There is a service station food store already in the City t been Ai ere and invested a lot of money. The established business w+ . ��`` a disadvantage. Mayor Bergeson stated that all ' u ° Member Carson's concerns need to be considered but are not part of this motion. The `ostways has proposed zoning for property it does not own. Motion carried with May o voting no. Final Plat, Clearwater Cre 4th Addition (revised) (3/5 Vote Required), Jeff Smyser — Staff advised the City Council approved the final plat for Clearwater Creek 4th Addition on July 24, 2000. There is a revision to that final plat. The revision is necessary because of the grade elevations on one lot where an existing home sits. With the creation of new lots, the driveway location must change for this existing house. This change in driveway location necessitates a change to the lot line. This in turn requires moving the lot lines for five (5) other lots. This situation affects Lots 1-6, Block 3. Staff referred to a drawing showing those lots on the July 24, 2000, plat, the revised August 8, 2000, plat, and a comparison of the two (2). The table below lists the changes 13