Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 27, 2000 <br />Mr. John Hudgens, 6661 Pelican Place, came forward and stated he has read through the resolution <br />and would like Council to consider the following issues: <br />1. Who would take responsibility to get all the entities involved together? <br />2. Setting a timetable for the meetings. <br />3. Perhaps scheduling a Council work session to define the goals and objectives that are <br />referred to within the resolution. <br />Mr. Ken Reichert, 6669 Pelican Place, came forward and stated he is in favor of the resolution. He <br />stated there is concern regarding the time constraints. Many residents are in limbo now regarding <br />what to do with their property. The resolution leaves the timing wide open. He suggested the <br />Council add a time period to the resolution. Residents need to know when a decision will be made. <br />Council Member Carlson asked for clarification regarding Council Member Reinert's proposed <br />changes to the resolution. <br />Council Member Reinert advised the two (2) cities involved sh•x:d pel d out. Also, a statement <br />regarding Ramsey County and the City of Shoreview should <br />Council Member Carlson stated the situation with Sho ,- vie ani, sey Council is different <br />because there are no plans for the north side of the ro r the next seven -(7) years. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated the purpose of the resol : on is bring all the parties involved together. The <br />purpose is not to discuss design details. T t o .�� s to list all parties involved. <br />Council Member Reinert stated he w <br />City wants to have a joint meeting <br />within the resolution. <br />clear that all four (4) parties are involved and the <br />m. The second suggestion is to spell both cities out <br />The City Engineer advise the Ci s not absolutely sure what Ramsey Council and the City of <br />Shoreview have discussethe project. He suggested the following be added to the <br />resolution : <br />WHEREAS, Ramsey Council and the City of Shoreview are discussion potential <br />reconstruction of other segments of CSAH 49; and <br />Council Member Carlson stated that would leave out the roadway to Columbus Township. She stated <br />she does not know if there have been discussion regarding that segment of the roadway. <br />The'City Engineer stated the reference to Lino Lakes should be left as is unless it is clarified to say <br />between 35W and County Road J. The reference to Shoreview refers to Ramsey County. <br />Council Member Carlson suggested the following be added to the first statement in the resolution: <br />And future reconstruction of Lake Drive from Hodgson Road through the I35 interchange. ill <br />