My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/08/2001 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2001
>
01/08/2001 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2015 1:33:21 PM
Creation date
2/4/2015 11:43:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
01/08/2001
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 8, 2001 <br />qualifies her to assist with administrative duties related to personnel. That type of background cannot <br />be expected of future incumbents and should not be required for a receptionist position. If an <br />administrative assistant is included in the 2002 budget, the receptionist duties will revert to the <br />current job description and the regular salary schedule. <br />Council Member Dahl moved to approve temporary 10% salary increase for Lisa Hogstad while she <br />assumes additional administrative duties for the Administration Department. Council Member <br />Reinert seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Non-union Salary Adjustments, Linda Waite Smith — Staff advised there is a group of <br />management/supervisory employees who are not represented by unions. As with unionized <br />employees, the City's compensation philosophy is to strive for salaries that are at the average paid by <br />cities of comparable size in the metro area as reported in the DCA Stanton annual salary survey. <br />Market adjustments are made to the salary range for each position (not the employee holding the <br />position) then a cost of living adjustment is made to the salary range. The actual amount of salary <br />increase for an employee depends on where that employee is in the salary range for his or her <br />position. <br />By last year the City had fallen behind significantly on salaries <br />considerable market adjustments were needed to bring those <br />positions were only adjusted to 95% of the average. Thi <br />to 100%, the same as AFSCME and Local 49 posi <br />AFSCME. Because <br />e average, non-union <br />endation brings those salaries <br />The recommended cost of living adjustme0, the same as union agreements settled to <br />date. <br />A market adjustment is not re + for e City Administrator position, which has a salary <br />range maximum that is 101x*. ton average. For the remaining positions, the recommended <br />market adjustments ar' = - foing: <br />Public superintendent <br />Public Se ices Director <br />Public Safety Director <br />Finance Director <br />Recreation Supervisor 2 <br />Community Development Director <br />Police Office Manager <br />City Clerk 7% <br />Director of Administration 1% <br />4% <br />6% <br />4% <br />4% <br />6% <br />1% <br />5% <br />Staff noted that although the Community Development Director position is currently vacant, it is the <br />salary range for the position that is being adjusted in anticipation of filling the position in the near <br />future. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.