My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/11/2002 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2002
>
02/11/2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2015 12:22:26 PM
Creation date
2/5/2015 9:52:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
02/11/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES <br />FEBRUARY 11, 2002 <br />Therefore, even though the proposed site is approximately 5.2 acres in size, the proposed picnic <br />shelter would not be allowed under City Zoning Ordinance, and would thus require approval of a <br />variance for construction. <br />A last issue of note is the roof material, a galvanized ribbed metal, noted on plans for the proposed <br />picnic shelter. City Zoning Ordinance Section 3, Subd. 4.D.8.£4 states that accessory buildings <br />should contain "no metal corrugated siding or roof, except upon tool sheds less than one hundred fifty <br />(150) square feet in area," with 4.D.8.£6 going on to require that "roof and exterior color and material <br />be compatible with the principal building (except for manufactured metal tool sheds)." The applicant <br />has been made aware of these zoning regulations in discussions with staff, and has indicated that the <br />roofing material could be changed to match that of the church. <br />Community Development Director Grochala continued stating th <br />request. In 1997, the Gethsemane United Methodist Church site <br />Subdivision, and Comprehensive Plan.Amendment•in order to con <br />requests were all approved at that time, subject to the followi <br />1. The subdivision include the formal dedicate <br />the understanding that Parcels B and C dill <br />construction of the street. <br />s an outstanding issue with the <br />nt a Rezoning, Minor <br />sonage,_. The above <br />On inspection of the records in preparation of thi <br />was never fulfilled. Staff is recommending th <br />the Conditional Use Permit amendment appr <br />The purpose for requiring the dedicatio <br />subdivision requirement that all lots sh <br />Parcel B and Parcel C of the minor <br />Coach Trail right-of-way, with <br />financially responsible for the future <br />t was found that the condition of approval <br />f -way dedication be made as a condition of <br />The condition of the mi . r subdivisi <br />church and testimony rec <br />proposed subdivision of P <br />e Coach Trail right-of-way was to satisfy the <br />their full frontage on a publicly dedicated street. <br />not meet this requirement as originally proposed. <br />proval was based on the information submitted by the <br />fig and Zoning Board. The church had indicated that the <br />ld be forthcoming. <br />If not for this, the minor subdi ion would have been denied due to its nonconformance with the <br />City's subdivision regulations. At a minimum the church would have been required to provide an <br />improved city street extension with the appropriate cul-de-sac turnaround. <br />Therefore, staff is of the opinion that the church needs to fulfill this requirement in one of two ways: <br />1. Dedicate the right-of-way for Stage Coach Trail to the northern property line of Parcel B as <br />originally proposed; or <br />The Stage Coach Trail right-of-way be dedicated to the city commencing at the north line of <br />the platted Stage Coach Trail right-of-way and extending northerly approximately 160 feet to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.