07/08/2002 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 8, 2002 with plans which indicated an area for future expansion. The company would now like to expand into the area indicated in the 1996 plans, and has submitted an application for a site plan review. Community Development Director Grochala indicated the site is a 1.12 acre, triangular piece of property located to the east of 4th Avenue within the Lino Industrial Park. Superior Masonry & Concrete abuts the site to the north, with Nol-Tec located to the south. Community Development Director Grochala stated the existing building measures 5,273 square feet. The proposed addition will be located to the east of the current building and measure 5,450 square feet. The expanded area will be used exclusively as repair bays. Building elevations show the proposed addition matching the existing building in terms of color and materials, which is rock face concrete block. Building height is similar as well. Community Development Director Grochala advised the staff r rt regarding this request was presented at the June 12, 2002 meeting of the Planning & Zonint,: • r, d. After consideration of the issues, Board members voted unanimously to recommend appro ill o ? Site Plan Review, with the following conditions: 1. Proper building permits be obtained prior to any s .n. 2. Permits be obtained by Rice Creek Watershed t prior to any site work or issuance of building permits. 3. Cut sheets showing a lighting fixture choi m='ng City Ordinance (shoebox style, no -spill), as well as a revised photometric lightiny,s ch reflects the new choice of fixture style, must be submitted prior to the issuan building permits. 4. Trash/dumpsters must be enclose • 'n : ix -foot high fence or wall. Elevation plans of the enclosure must be submitted pri •o iss ce of building permits. Community Development Directored staff recommends adoption of Resolution No. 02-70, Approving Site and Building mergency Apparatus, with conditions. Councilmember Carlson ques • - • ether there were any site coverage percentage issues with this proposed addition. Communit "x 1 evelopment Director Grochala stated that there were not and indicated in this zoning district, velopments are allowed up to 90 percent of impervious coverage and this site does not approach that limit. Councilmember Carlson questioned why the recommendations of the Rice Creek Watershed District, as listed in the staff report, were not included in staff's list of conditions. Community Development Director Grochala stated the Rice Creek Watershed District must issue its permits prior to the City submitting building permits. Therefore, he indicated the applicant must comply with the requirements of the Watershed District whether or not those requirements were included as part of staff's conditions. Councilmember Carlson questioned whether the City's approval of this request would influence Rice Creek Watershed District's actions on the TWAFAA. Community Development Director Grochala stated this was not the case. 11