My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/12/2002 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2002
>
08/12/2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2015 1:33:04 PM
Creation date
2/5/2015 1:16:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
08/12/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 12, 2002 <br />were now questioning why Holly Drive can not be done first. He indicated the City only has a certain <br />amount of funds available but if the schedule for Holly Drive could possibly be moved up, he would <br />strongly support such an opportunity. However, he felt it was not a good idea to tell the residents that <br />Holly Drive could be reconstructed sooner than 2004. He indicted the City Council has discussed the <br />facts regarding this situation. <br />Councilmember O'Donnell concurred with Councilmember Reinert's comments. He agreed that the <br />City Council set priorities some time ago and all three roads under consideration are in dire need of <br />repair. He indicated none of the Councilmembers want to see injury or harm come to any resident of <br />Lino Lakes and all would like for these road projects to be completed as soon as possible. However, <br />he agreed that there are economic issues to deal with. He stated if it was possible to move Holly <br />Drive up on the schedule all the Councilmembers would support this. He supported moving forward <br />with the plan that is currently in place. <br />Councilmember Carlson believed she was clear in indicating tha . Street was the first project <br />ordered by the City Council and must be completed. However, r e wo °s like Holly Drive moved up <br />on the schedule and completed in conjunction with the 62nd M ry" pct. She acknowledged that at <br />this point the Council does not know where the funds will c e frim for these projects and she has <br />asked for a report on that matter. She stated she did not t` e Holly Drive put off again and for <br />more promises to be broken. She stated she would pr •complete the Holly Drive project in 2003 <br />if possible and, if not possible, then it must be com ed m°1 04. <br />Councilmember O'Donnell moved to continue, <br />the Monday, September 23, 2002 regular City <br />motion. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />hearing on the Five -Year Financial Plan to <br />uncil meeting. Councilmember Dahl seconded the <br />ADMINISTRATION DEPART ` P 1 RT, DAN TESCH <br />Consideration of Resolutio <br />Funding Source, Ann Blair, <br />session, the Council considered <br />pproving the Purchase of Scanner and Designating <br />Clerk Blair advised at the August 8, 2002 City Council work <br />d discussed Staff's recommendation that a new scanner unit and its <br />accompanying software be purchased for the City. <br />City Clerk Blair indicated City staff has proposed that approximately $20,000 be approved for this <br />purchase, with the funding source identified as Contingency Account 101-499-4905-000. Staff <br />recommends the purchase of a multi -function scanner/printer/copier unit from Coordinated Business <br />Systems based upon their quotation. This purchase includes the hardware, accessories, software, <br />technical support, installation, and ongoing training. It also includes a 90 -day standard <br />electro/mechanical parts and labor warranty, as well as a five-year manufacturer's guarantee, which <br />provides limited additional coverage. A full service maintenance agreement is available, which is <br />inclusive and covers repair and replacement of all items except for paper and staples. The <br />maintenance agreement is volume -based and is one-third of a cent (.0003) for scanned images and not <br />more than .0125 (approximately one cent) for printed or copied images. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.