Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 26, 2002 <br />16. All federal, state, county, and watershed district permits shall be obtained prior to <br />commencement of site improvements. <br />17. The developer shall enter into a Development Agreement with the City prior to <br />commencement of site improvements. <br />Community Development Director Grochala advised that a sign will be installed at the end of the <br />temporary cul-de-sac indicating the future extension of such streets so no confusion will occur. <br />Councilmember O'Donnell asked about the stub of Street G for future extension with Holly Drive and <br />if the number of lots would go from four to five. He also asked if a variance would be needed. <br />Community Development Director Grochala stated it would go up by one lot and all the lots proposed <br />would still exceed the minimum lot requirements of the City. <br />Councilmember Carlson requested clarification of the location <br />Director Grochala used a colored rendition to point out the locati <br />corner of the property. <br />treet G. Community Development <br />Street G in the southwest <br />Mayor Bergeson stated there has been a lot of public input <br />tonight. However, a minute or two will be allowed if an <br />been said before. <br />a public hearing will not be conducted <br />s to say something that has not <br />Lou Masonick, 6440 Tally Lane, stated he is the spoke an for citizens in that area who originally <br />opposed this development. He explained that 1 st= ey provided a description of their concerns <br />to the City. He stated that Community Deve : •i ent Director Grochala did a good job of laying <br />everything out in the staff report and had a' • • the EAW petition. He stated they did submit an <br />EAW petition but received it back from • son saying they didn't do it right by not including the <br />zip codes. The zip codes were added •• : several other things and resubmitted but he has not <br />hear back from Mr. Larson. Mr. omc sta a called them and it was suggested the City <br />Engineer help the residents work on • W petition but they didn't contact the City Engineer. <br />Mr. Masonick stated they c, •she • ha Anoka County does about its County roads and he is <br />concerned there could be serio problems if that is not resolved. In addition, he is concerned that <br />lawn fertilizer is washing into th ponds and asked about the impact to the wetlands. In closing, he <br />stated the group started with a lot of enthusiasm but is disappointed and now feel you can't fight City <br />Hall; it appears this was preordained from the beginning. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated this group made an effort to initiate an EAW but it was sent back for <br />additional information. He asked what would happen if their EAW request was approved after City <br />Council action. <br />It was City Attorney Hawkins' opinion that it would come back to the City to make a determination <br />whether significant environmental issues exist that need to be addressed. <br />Community Development Director Grochala stated the project does not get close to the threshold to <br />require an EAW worksheet and falls into an exempt category. But, an EAW can be initiated by a <br />15 <br />