My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/23/2002 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2002
>
09/23/2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2015 2:41:00 PM
Creation date
2/5/2015 2:08:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
09/23/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 23, 2002 <br />Lakes. She stated 35W and 35E and 694 need to add lanes, noting nothing has changed with those <br />roadways since the 1960s. <br />Councilmember Dahl stated a letter was sent to Anoka County and now there has been time for <br />second thoughts. She stated the recommendation was actually from Anoka County Commissioner <br />Margaret Langfeld and a County Engineer, not from City staff, and provided as a verbal <br />recommendation to Mr. Grochala. Councilmember Dahl stated she would have liked to see that in <br />writing from Anoka County since Lino Lakes has provided a letter but now the County is asking for a <br />resolution. However, Anoka County has not provided anything in writing on what they will or will <br />not do or when it will be done. <br />Councilmember Dahl stated she would like to wait since as it sits now, she is not ready to say yes. <br />She stated she would like the matter tabled since staff is still waiting for a letter from Anoka County <br />and she would like to see exactly what Anoka County will agreand when. Councilmember Dahl <br />stated she would also like this addressed by the full Council. <br />Councilmember Reinert stated you also need to think about <br />a lot of residential development has been put along Lake D <br />plan, there may have been greater setbacks to assure the read <br />He stated Mayor Bergeson said south of Birch Street <br />currently the plan is a divided highway unless Ano <br />Then it may be reduced but currently it is a divid hi> ay. <br />Councilmember Reinert suggested that lowe <br />50 mph but if it is lower, Anoka County <br />45 to 40 mph would provide a road imp <br />safe. <br />. He noted that in recent years <br />if the City had known about this <br />d not encroach on those residences. <br />going to be a divided highway, but <br />an work with MnDOT on the speeds. <br />speeds is a solution. He stated the speed is currently <br />could design lesser of a highway. He suggested <br />that better fits the character of Lino Lakes and is <br />Mayor Bergeson noted that is a con • .• the City's approval included in the resolution before the <br />Council. <br />Community Development Dire or Grochala clarified that Anoka County did not request a resolution <br />from Lino Lakes. He explained at in discussions he had with Anoka County representatives, it was <br />asked whether the Council had adopted a resolution in support. Community Development Director <br />Grochala stated he said no but they were looking at doing that. Anoka County had commented to him <br />that for a project of this magnitude, councils typically respond with a resolution. <br />Community Development Director Grochala stated Anoka County did respond to the City's plans <br />with a simple response that the plan previously submitted was not acceptable and they would still go <br />forward with the compromise design to reduce the right-of-way from 120 feet to 100 feet, the <br />roadway width from 84 feet to 68 feet, and through design efforts utilize landscaping on the southern <br />portion from Birch Street to County Road J to incorporate and support a lower designation of speed <br />limit to allow for removal of the median south of Birch Street. He explained this was not considered <br />north of Birch Street since design parameters did not dictate the removal of the median and there are <br />few access points so the median would not create access problems. He stated Anoka County has <br />11, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.