Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES ;- SEPTEMBER 23, 2002 <br />Councilmember Carlson asked if the lots can be built on in the future should this be approved, as is, <br />with one lot being less than one acre with existing buildings and other lot being less than ten acres. <br />City Attorney Hawkins stated his opinion that a lot of less than one acre should not be approved since <br />it would be substandard. <br />Community Development Director Grochala stated the existing eleven acre lot without the split is in <br />conformance. He read the two criteria as contained in the Zoning Ordinance and stated he would <br />appreciate some time to review this language since it appears there are two conflicting standards <br />related to right-of-way. <br />Community Development Director Grochala suggested the Council delay action on this request so he <br />and the applicant can review this information and return with a recommendation. <br />Associate Planner Gretz noted the staff report from 1997 indicat ap <br />advised by staff that the 11 acres would not in all probability be <br />proximity of wetlands and driveway. <br />Councilmember Carlson asked why this discussion is <br />Planning and Zoning Board. She noted the applicant <br />could request a 10 and 1. She stated she is also co <br />previous approvals where the existence of right -o <br />Community Development Director Grochala <br />it is not staff's responsibility to lead the a <br />and subdivision ordinance and assure co <br />indicated on the survey. <br />licant, at that time, was <br />e subdivided due to the <br />at this point after review by the <br />faith thought he had eleven acres and <br />perhaps there has been more than two <br />as not considered. <br />ed d he just realized what the lot dimensions were and <br />ough this process. They are to review the zoning <br />He noted that the dimensions are confusing as <br />Mayor Bergeson suggested that actio <br />with the applicant. Then the <br />some other action. <br />led for a few minutes to allow staff to discuss the details <br />ermine if they want to table to a future meeting or take <br />The Council concurred with this uggestion. <br />Consider Resolution No. 02-127, Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract of Triplex Panel for <br />Lift Station #4, Jim Studenski — City Engineer Studenski advised that bids were opened on <br />September 12, 2002 for the construction and installation of a new tri-plex lift station panel. This <br />replacement of the panel on Lift Station #4 is to accommodate the increased flow due to expansion <br />within the City. He presented the results of the bid opening, noting the low bid was received from <br />SyCom, Inc. in the amount of $22,189. Funding for this project is the area -and -unit fund and the <br />substantial completion date for this project is December 15, 2002. <br />Councilmember Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 02-127, Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract <br />for Triplex Panel for Lift Station #4 to SyCom, Inc. in the amount of $22,189. Councilmember <br />O'Donnell seconded the motion. <br />26 <br />• <br />