Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 8, 2004 <br />APPROVED <br />• 1 <br />2 FOX DEN — CONSERVATION DESIGN — MICHAEL GROCHALA <br />3 <br />4 Community Development Director Grochala stated the City Council recently adopted the <br />5 City's Parks, Natural Open Space/Greenways and Trail System Plan. An integral <br />6 component of the plan implementation is to pursue conservation development through a <br />7 collaborative City/Developer process. As Jeff Schoenbauer from Brauer & Associates <br />8 previously discussed with the Council, the proposed Fox Den Acres subdivision provides <br />9 an excellent opportunity for the City to begin implementation of the plan. <br />10 <br />11 Community Development Director Grochala advised Royal Oaks Development has <br />12 submitted a conventional development plan for Fox Den Acres to the City for review and <br />13 approval. While their proposal does attempt to provide open space and minimize impact <br />14 to wetlands, City staff, with the assistance of Jeff Schoenbauer, have identified several <br />15 opportunities to further improve the design through the conservation development <br />16 approach. <br />17 <br />18 Community Development Director Grochala reviewed the preliminary sketch noting the <br />19 public values the plan strives for. While Royal Oaks is still pursuing a conventional <br />20 development plan, they have agreed to work concurrently with the City to explore the <br />21 possibility of a conservation development. As part of the process, the Rice Creek <br />22 Watershed District is providing in-kind engineering services to provide an in-depth <br />• 23 assessment of the area wetlands to aid in planning. It is anticipated that staff could have a <br />24 preliminary design laid out by the end of September. <br />25 <br />26 Community Development Director Grochala stated during discussions with Royal Oaks, <br />27 they have continually expressed concern over "losing their place in line" and the <br />28 availability of lots in accordance with City's growth management ordinance. This is the <br />29 primary reason for pursuing approval of a conventional subdivision. This concern <br />30 routinely comes up in staff/developer discussions regarding conservation development <br />31 opportunities. <br />32 <br />33 Staff has been evaluating options to alleviate this concern while still meeting the <br />34 Comprehensive Plan's policy which provides for a "limit residential growth to an <br />35 average of 147 units per year...". One possible alternative is to allow a developer to <br />36 advance lots under the phasing guidelines set forth in the growth management ordinance <br />37 in exchange for the conservation development design that provides the identified public <br />38 values. <br />39 <br />40 Community Development Director Grochala reviewed an example in relation to <br />41 advancing lots to a developer. In return for the conservation design the City would allow <br />42 the developer to advance the 2006 lots for construction in 2005. While this method front <br />43 loads 2005 by 44 lots it would still decrease the number of lots available in 2006 by 44 <br />44 lots. The end result is that the same number of lots would be created over the two year <br />45 period. <br />• 46 <br />