Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APRIL 20, 2005 <br />APPROVED <br />• 1 Economic Development Coordinator Divine stated costs of acquiring both sites make the <br />2 project economically unfeasible for this developer. According to the initial pro forma, it <br />3 would take $500,000 in Tax Increment Financing (TIF) assistance. An initial TIF <br />4 analysis determined it would require 10 years of TIF. <br />5 <br />6 Economic Development Coordinator Divine stated staff is seeking Council direction in <br />7 regard to whether the benefits gained from providing an established roadway, <br />8 redeveloping the Vacha property, and providing additional commercial tax base that <br />9 meets the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan outweighs 10 years of foregoing the new <br />10 taxes. If the Council does not wish to proceed with this alternative, the developer will <br />11 continue to pursue the first option of developing only on the Schwan's site. <br />12 <br />13 Council requested a clearer map of the site plan and more details in relation to what the <br />14 developer is proposing. Council also directed staff to communicate to the developer the <br />15 strong recommendation from engineering staff to close 77th Street. <br />16 <br />17 This item will appear on the Council work session agenda Wednesday, May 4, 2005, 5:30 <br />18 p.m. <br />19 <br />20 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT POLICIES, JIM STUDENSKI <br />21 <br />22 City Administrator Heitke advised as part of the Pavement Management Program (PMP), <br />• 23 staff presented the draft Pavement Management Plan to the Council on April 6, 2005. <br />24 The intent of the policy is to establish the procedures for implementation of the PMP. <br />25 These procedures include the overall street condition rating; project financing, special <br />26 assessment determination and maintenance. <br />27 <br />28 City Administrator Heitke advised minor revisions would be made to the draft Pavement <br />29 Management Plan. Staff is requesting direction from the Council as to any changes that <br />30 may be needed to the policies prior to staff placing this on the May 9 Council agenda for <br />31 adoption. Staff also needs to know whether any significant changes to these policies <br />32 should be expected as staff is in the process of updating the Five Year Financial Plan, <br />33 using these policies as the basis for identifying, scheduling and funding pavement <br />34 management projects. <br />35 <br />36 Council directed staff to provide a draft of a motion to receive and accept the Pavement <br />37 Management Report and Finance Report as well as a draft of a motion to approve the <br />38 Pavement Management Plan at the May 4, 2005, Council work session. <br />39 <br />40 Councilmember Carlson also requested more information regarding the storm water <br />41 utility fee, clarification regarding the method of assessment, and Comprehensive Plan <br />42 references. <br />43 <br />44 ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS, JIM STUDENSKI <br />45 <br />• 46 Mayor Bergeson excused himself from the discussion and requested Councilmember <br />47 Stoltz chair this portion of the meeting. <br />3 <br />