Laserfiche WebLink
Inwood Townhomes <br />Page 2 <br />• Traffic Concerns. <br />o Included in this resubmittal is a Traffic Review of the Inwood Development executed by SSTS, <br />LLC. The conclusion of this analysis is that the traffic volume shows less intense traffic volumes <br />than those previously studied in the 2014 Traffic Study for the Inwood development. No <br />adverse traffic impacts are anticipated on surrounding roadways and intersections. Traffic <br />from the proposed development is anticipated to be primarily to/from the south (I-94 and <br />retail) and west (I-694 and retail) with very low demand to use Island Trail through the <br />neighborhood to the north. Additionally, Island Trail is designated as a Minor Collector per the <br />City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan and was designed and built accordingly. <br />• Turn Lanes. <br />o The engineering memorandum indicates that turn lanes should be added along Island Trail for <br />both the east and west access locations, each having more than 35 units. The Inwood <br />Preliminary Plat contemplated a very similar site design to what has been submitted with this <br />application with a similar number of units, and Island Trail was designed and built to <br />accommodate this plan. No turn lanes were required at that time. There is not sufficient room <br />to accommodate turn lanes, and this would result in ripping up previously constructed <br />sidewalks. Additionally, the adopted Lake Elmo Engineering Design and Construction <br />Standards Manual do not require a turn lane for developments with 35 units or more. <br />• Design Comments. <br />o The staff report states that vinyl is prohibited, but the Lake Elmo Design Guidelines and <br />Standards Manual state that materials which are prohibited as the primary façade material <br />include vinyl. This indicates that vinyl is allowed but must be secondary to the primary building <br />materials outlined in said manual. We would agree to use Hardie siding for the board and <br />batten on the townhomes but would not be amenable to using this material for the entire <br />façade for a number of reasons. First, Hardie requires more maintenance than vinyl including <br />painting and caulking. This would increase Homeowners Association dues and maintenance. <br />Vinyl breathes well, has a higher energy rating, and there is almost no possibility of water <br />intrusion with no requirement to paint or caulk. Second, Hardie would add a significant cost <br />increase, as much as $7,000 a townhome, where buyers see little to no value in this change in <br />material. We have provided a breakdown of the percentage of vinyl the townhomes would <br />incorporate if we used Hardie for the board and batten, and the total percentage would be <br />42.6% vinyl, with the front elevation consisting of only 30.7% vinyl. We have also included a <br />rendering of the apartment building from the 5th Street side in response to a comment about <br />the apartment design. <br />• Landscaping. <br />o We added additional entrance landscaping as well as a landscape feature in the middle of <br />the site and buffering from the bank parking lot. While there is not a tree proposed exactly <br />every 50 feet along the private streets, the ordinance reads that a minimum of one tree per <br />lot or one tree for every 50 feet of street frontage, lake shore or stream frontage, or fraction <br />thereof (whichever is greater) shall be planted and specifies that such trees may be clustered <br />or placed at regular intervals to best complement existing landscape design patterns in the <br />area. We also meet the requirement of providing a minimum of five trees per acre of <br />disturbance in addition to the aforementioned requirement. <br /> <br />C O M P R E H E N S IV E P L A N A M E N D M EN T <br /> <br />With the 2040 Comprehensive Update (well after the entire Inwood site had an approved preliminary plat), <br />a portion of the site to the west of Island Trail was re-guided from High Density Residential to Mixed Use <br />Commercial, and the east side of Island Trail remained High Density Residential. This Land Use Guide Plan <br />change was inconsistent with the approved preliminary pat for Inwood At the time of the Inwood PUD <br />approval the City of Lake Elmo allowed the blending of densities across parcels. Since, then, however,