05-04-71 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Metadata

Thumbnails

Annotations

Page 2 Minutes of the meeting of the Lake Elmo Village Council May 4, 1971 According to the Iversons the letter was examined by the Attorney Generals office and approved before it was released to the4i. Iverson stated that at -the time that lots 21& 22 were available neither .lot was considered buildable; however lot 22 was issued a building permit on a variance so question is why not lot 21. Motion by.C. Shervheim 2nd by C.Friedrich to table the matter. Carried 4-0. Recommendation that the matter be turned back to the Planning Commission with instructions to research the Berschens Easement regarding the possible vacation of the property. Mayor reported that Lake Jane Hills Development had withdrawn the original plan .for I acre lots and were reworking the plan and would be r.ewubmitting at a later date. Richard Johnson asked if a, new plat required a hearing. He was informed 'that a hearing was required and notice of said hearing would have to be published in the Village legal publication the Stillwater Daily Gazette at least 10 days prior to the hearing. A mailing to all the residents in the area is not required. Mr. Carl Hermaan, Mr. Dan Herbst, Mr Bill Burns and Mr. Tom Backstrom all .representi:ng Pemton (Cimarron) were on hand to discuss problems of mutual interest. #1 Cimarron deposited. with the Village Clerk a Check in the amount of $3,980.00 to cover the permit fee as required by Section 6 of Fast Oakdale Ordinance #32. The Village has been paid .for the :First 107 units leaving 398 units at $10.00 each. #2.A second check in the amount of $2,000.00 was deposited. to cover the gas inspections on the first 200 units. it was pointed ou t that the Village Gas Inspector had suffered a heart attack and that the inspections had not been completed but that it would be taken care of. 3-It was pointed out that a fee of $&7.50 per inspection was. set; forth in said Ordinance #32 to cover the inspection and hook—up of each unit and thin amount of fees to cover the. entire park would be 33,787.50. 4. Building permits are still to be made out for the Park Maintainance Building, the Golf Course Maintain. ance Building, and the storeage buildings and fences. Pemtom agreed to obtain the pxztm permits and would send the fees to the clerk. 5. It was pointed out that an annual inspection fee for each mobile home: park is requited by Section 19 of said Ordinance #32. This fee is $25.00 plus $.25 for each unit installed as of January 1. Thus the fee for Cimarron would be $G25.00 plus $.25 for each unit over 100. 6. Cimarron asked the status of the 3.2 License that they had applied for. They were informed that an Ordinance covering this matter was in the works and that they would be informed as soon as it has been processed. Carl Herman expredsed the opinion that the $10.00 inspedition fee was to have been complete and cover everything (gas, plumbing, building and park). Reference was made -to a letter from the clerk dated June 27, 1970. It was pointed out that the letter covered three different inspections not one as `they had interpreted it. To clarify the situation the minutes of the Council meeting of June 2, 1970 were read and x discussed. Mr. Burns agreed. that he would submit to the clerk a listing of the units installed and would report monthly on the activity that had taken place. The Council agreed that a monthly statement of fees due would be mailed to Pemtom. Pemtom said that a letter establishing the bond for the cur— rent development of Cimarron Park was awainting only approval from the engineer and the Council. Council advised that this matter would be taken up at the next Council Meeting on May 189 1971.