October 17, 2006 CCP - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

DRAFT The Permit will allow painting and sandblasting on Saturday and Sunday, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., weather permitting. (Motion passed 5-0) 9. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING: A. Resolution No. 2006-093. Ordinance l uL uuu aw<.vunlq - IUVOLL111L. 1d1U1G11 O1LG � 1 V OUCCL( The City Planner reported that this City Council -initiated the proposal to reclassify the approximately 14 acre site from PIT to RAD and rezone the site from PF to RR has been recommended for approval by the Planning Commission. The matter was on the Council's agenda September 5 and tabled to September 19 to be considered by a full five member Council. M/S Conlin/DeLapp — to table further review three months from now with definite plans for a church on the site at the second meeting of December, 2006, Council Member Conlin requested that the Findings be par the approved motion. M/S/P Johnson/Smith — to amend the motion to 12 (Motion 3-2: DeLapp and Conlin) M/S/P Johnson/Smith — to table further discussion and" the Apostolic Church return within twelve months, updating the Council asto where they are with their plans for use of the site for a church. (Motion passed 3 �; Conlin and DeLapp) Pastor Friend asked the City Council if it v l be necessary for the church to have complete construction plans withWtWelve months. City Attorney Filla advised Pastor Frietid that his: interpretation of the motion is that the church should have at least a schedule for the use of the site for new church purposes, but that construction plans were not necessarily required. R The City PlanneFThformed Council that a letter from the Oak Park Heights City Administrator had been received regarding an annexation request from three residents owning land in Lake .E mos - The Oak Park Heights City Council has requested a joint work session with the Lae Elmo City Council to discuss the property owner's request. The City Planner reported that at this time, Lake Elmo has not received any letters from the owner's requesting the detachment/annexation. He noted that, as of August 1, 2006, both cities must now approve a concurrent detachment/annexation, rather than just the annexing city as had been the law previously. Lake Elmo needs to be directly involved. City Administrator Rafferty said that he has talked with the Oak Park Heights City Administrator Johnson, informing him that he would bring the request for a joint meeting to the Lake Elmo Council's attention for any action. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 19, 2006