My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-18-01 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
2000's
>
2001
>
09-18-01 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2025 9:18:54 AM
Creation date
10/1/2019 3:27:15 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
spending the money. Planner Dillerud responded this is how it was stated in <br />the RFP and you are bond with the RFP. <br />Council member DeLapp stated there are two good proposals that address <br />our needs. Is an outside look best versus continuity and then there is the <br />finance issue. DeLapp felt the money is so small it doesn't warrant a second <br />interview. Council member Dunn suggested the Council watch the video of <br />the interviews with the consultants. <br />M/S/P Armstrong/DeLapp - to postpone consideration on consultants <br />pending review of Planning Commission tapes. (Motion passed 5-0.) It was <br />pointed out that the consultant interviews section of the Planning <br />Commission meeting was not videotape <br />B. Section 520 Site Plan & Final PUD Plan — United Properties <br />At its September 10 meeting, the Planning Commission approved the <br />application by United Properties for Site Plan approval of a proposed 32,263 <br />sq.ft. gross floor area office to be located on the 3.5 acre Lot 1, Block 2 <br />Eagle Point Business Center 2nd Addition, subject to several conditions, <br />including substitution of a revised Site Plan reducing the amount of off- <br />street parking from 136 spaces to 132 spaces; and a corresponding increase <br />to parking landscape islands area. <br />There was discussion on the applicant's proposal to incorporate EFIS <br />architectural enhancements/materials to approx. 30% of the exterior <br />surface —the balance proposed to be brick/glass. Council member DeLapp <br />pointed out that EFIS 2" B board burns like a torch. ...block does meet our <br />code as in the clinic and gas station, and he would not support a variance. <br />Dale Glowa, United Properties, explained EFIS is not a flammable material <br />and has an insulating value. They have used EFIS in their commercial <br />buildings and these buildings have stood the test of time. Council member <br />DeLapp responded with we are talking cheap here. The intent of the office <br />park is not just to hall people into work, but provide a strong building for us. <br />Why wouldn't brick or stucco work? Mr. Doughtery answered because of <br />the variation in wall surface which will be hanging three ft out and it is not <br />affordable to hang brick out there. Council member Siedow didn't like a <br />Council member calling people cheap. There is new technology, and he <br />didn't care what it cost. <br />LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 18, 2001 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.