04-16-02 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Attorney Filla prepared a supplement to the Eagle Point 2nd Addition Development Agreement that addresses the additional developer obligation and costs for construction of utilities in that portion of Eagle Point Boulevard between the two cul-de-sacs. The Parks Dedication fee -in -lieu in the amount of $32,599.20 will be payable with the Building Permit. Attorney Filla also prepared an amendment to the Development Agreement for Eagle Point Business Park 2nd Addition, which extends the completion dates for the Eagle Point Boulevard. Street and Utility Improvements to December 31, 2002. M/S/P DeLapp/Armstrong — to adopt Resolution No. 2002-028 approving the Preliminary Plat of Eagle Point Business Park 3`d Addition. (Motion passed 5-0). M/S/P DeLapp/Siedow — to adopt Resolution No. 2002-029 approving the Final Plat and Development Agreement for Eagle Point Business Park 3`d Addition. (Motion passed 5- 0). M/S/P DeLapp/Siedow — to approve version 2 of Amendment No. 3, as presented at the April 16 Council meeting, to the Eagle Point Business Park 2°d Addition Development Agreement to extend the completion date for public improvement to December 31, 2002. (Motion passed 5-0). United Properties Special Assessment Reapportionment Request The finance director reported United Properties has requested the special assessments levied on Outlot B of the Eagle Point Boulevard Second be reapportioned due to the plat development for Bremer Financial. There are two assessments: Utility Assessment with a principal balance of $79,459.92 and 2001 Street Assessment with a principal balance of $83,047.76. NUS/P DeLapp/Dunn — to approve the reapportionment of special assessments, as presented, on Eagle Point Boulevard, Outlot B. (Motion passed 5-0). E. Comprehensive Plan Update: Obiectine Land Owners The city planner reported that since the completion of the local hearing process on the new Comp Plan, several large land owners (including North Suburban and Dale Properties) have directed letters to the Metropolitan Council that object to the City's decision not to propose extension of the MUSA and the regional sewer that would go with that extension. The planner was advised that the Metropolitan Council staff was considering a forum at which these objecting land owners would be permitted to make its case for MUSA and sewer in Lake Elmo. He said he was asked if Lake Elmo wanted to participate. The Council indicated the objecting land owners had an opportunity to address their concerns at the public hearings and other processes State Law prescribes for local planning. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 16, 2002