My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-11-02 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
2000's
>
2002
>
06-11-02 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2025 9:40:32 AM
Creation date
10/1/2019 3:33:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
parallel 13 wells upstream in the aquifer Woodbury is proposing to build 13 wells, they <br />may not have an adequate water supply. Four years ago the Met Council came up with <br />plans for light rail and transit where people want to live, work, bathe in bunch of <br />apartments, and co -mingled stores, offices and other business establishments. The Smart <br />Growth mode they have for us is the one Woodbury started with their prime outlet center <br />and continuing with 500 affordable housing units on 50 acres north of Markgraf Lake. <br />The Plan called for having 13,000 people living in that intersection half of Woodbury and <br />half in Lake Elmo. The residents would be represented by two Cities but would both be <br />in the Stillwater School District. <br />Planner Dillerud: <br />Responding to Councilor DeLapp's continent about the smart growth node at I-94 and <br />Keats, the Planner said that he saw what looks like a spider with feet that is their new <br />regional growth policy. They are going to try to smart growth at hubs and along major <br />transportation corridors. The plan is not as geographic specific as Council member <br />DeLapp believes. <br />Council Member Siedow: <br />He voted against the draft Comp Plan because of the I-94 development corridor. He <br />would like commercial for the first one-third of a mile with the next one-third for multi- <br />unit residential and the remainder for Open Space single family housing. Lake Elmo <br />should have some responsibility for having this utopia in a metropolitan area. We share <br />benefits of a big city, but we do not pay our fair share. If services were along the I- 94 <br />corridor, commercial would be the least taxing to our citizens. We could use 1-94 as a <br />commercial tax base. The vast majority of our residents work out of Lake Elmo and use <br />services outside the City. With some commercial along our border rather than a house <br />every 2.5 acres, we would be protecting the City from being annexed. He stated that the <br />impact of the sewer would be to increase the underlying values to where the existing 2.5 <br />acre housing south of 101h Street would be redeveloped at urban densities. <br />Todd Ptacelc, Planning Commission Member: <br />A financial reality, the I-94 money is a trade off from Eagle Point Blvd for sidewalks, <br />improvements in the Old Village. We have to move forward with a positive approach. If <br />we didn't supply our information on OP developments, this would be a perfect <br />opportunity to show the Met Council staff by a tour. <br />Council member DeLapp: <br />The Met. Council in the seven county regional areas takes off the top 40% of all <br />commercial taxes. Tax money never comes back. If they build commercial in <br />Woodbury, Lake Elmo actually get some taxes. <br />Marc Hugunin: <br />The City Staff could come to the Board with the Big Picture showing what explaining <br />Lake Elmo's values are and how the Comprehensive Plan is consistent with, and <br />enhances these values. He wouldn't rule out a tour of the City by the Council. Mr. <br />Hugunin agreed with the Planner that taking a high road approach with the Council <br />LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING DUNE 11, 2002 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.