My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-17-02 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
2000's
>
2002
>
09-17-02 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2025 9:40:34 AM
Creation date
10/1/2019 3:33:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP <br />SEPTEMBER 17, 2002 <br />Mayor Hunt called the workshop to order at 5:00 p.m. at the Lake Elmo City Hall. The <br />purpose of the workshop was to discuss annexation of 49 acres to Oak Park Heights. <br />PRESENT: Lake Elmo City Council: Mayor Hunt, Council members Chuck Siedow, <br />Steve DeLapp, and Rose Armstrong. Oak Park Heights Council. Mayor David Beaudet, <br />Council members Mary McComber, Mark Swenson, Jack Doerr. <br />Mayor Hunt explained the two Councils were in attendance to consider a joint request to <br />detach from Lake Elmo and annex into Oak Park Heights about 49 acres of land. This <br />request for annexation by landowners, Bernie and Louella Nass, Tom Bidon and Robert <br />Buberl, came after the Lake Elmo Council denied the property owners request to approve <br />commercial development of the 49 acres. The land parcel is located adjacent to and south <br />of Highway 36, near the Kern Center. <br />Mayor Hunt stated Lake Elmo wants to be your neighbor, and he knew OPH wanted to <br />be our good neighbors. He noted that he and three Lake Elmo Council members, present, <br />all oppose annexation. Hunt assured OPH that absent Council member Dunn would <br />oppose annexation as well. The Council felt there is a tremendous benefit for the land to <br />stay in Lake Elmo because the Council feels the area is very environmentally sensitive. <br />The land needs to be developed carefully to keep from changing water drainage patterns. <br />Lake Elmo is concerned with what could happen to the adjacent neighbors. <br />OPH Council Member McComber said she knew there were battles before and she didn't <br />want to go there. If there is not an agreement, she would not be in favor of annexation. <br />OPH Council Member Mark Swenson stated every time you bring that "A" word up, <br />somebody's getting offended, somebody's getting hurt, somebody's losing something. <br />Somebody's not gaining enough. He suggested that officials from both cities first decide <br />if this is something they even want. For himself, he would not support anything coming <br />into Oak Park Heights unless Lake Elmo's entire Council supports it and all the <br />landowners support it. <br />Council member DeLapp criticized the landowners annexation request, which he hoped <br />would not create a situation where we have to give in order to allow somebody to make <br />more money than anybody else in Lake Elmo is going to make just because they happen <br />to have contiguous property with another city. <br />Council member Armstrong indicated the proposed annexation was beyond the scope of <br />what Lake Elmo really should be doing, this annexation back and forth so people get a <br />better deal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.