07-17-79 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY OF LAKE L%NO CITY COUNCIL MCNi1TESt JULY 179 1979 -4- KAISER CORTINIM: It was suggested the State be contacted and be made aware of the Cityts interest in this proposal, Mr, Kaiser will have to appear before the Planning Commission to request the rezoning and subdivision ofthe land, This type of use is eonsistant with the propcs ad. Comprehensive Plan, I:' GINEERtS REPORT; A 'Tall Park Second Addition Improvements The Engineer feels additional sealcoating needs to be done to bring the improvement up to specs. Ile is recommending 550 feet of sealcoating be done to cover roller marks, Bruce Folz stated -this will cost an. additional $$19500. He feels this not a reasonable burden to place on, the developer, Bngineer Rohrer stated this should be the respons— ibility of the balektop contractor as the street was paved when the weather conditions were not, favorable' 'thus causing a defective job, Armstrong moved# Mottaz seconded' that the Rigineers report be enforced to the fullest. Thus the Engineers recommendation of sealcoating be completed by the developer, Discussion -. Pott suggested the sealcoating be done in 1980 rather than 1979 in case additional sealcoating needs to be done. Armstrong and Mottaz agreed to so amend the motion. Motion carried 5-0. The Ehgineer questioned the reduced area of the ponding and the steep— ness of the slope down to the ponding area, The Council had previously agreed to the ponding change, The &gineer questioned if capacity of -the pond is as much as originally planned since it is deeper rather than wider. Ile also questioned the design of the elopes+ indicating they may be a safety hazard. The developer will stabalize the slope with some -type of growth, lhgineer Bohrer requested the Council to notify developers -that ac— cording to their Development Agreement daily on —site inspection is to be handled by the developers engineer. Some developers presume the City .Engineer will handle this, The City Ihgineer will not sign any certification of work .completed until he receives a certificate from the developers engineer stating that the plans and specs have been complied with, Periodic inspections will. be made by the City Engineer to verify compliance, B, Maintenance Buildin — Lhgineer Bohrer presented five alternative designs. Ail of the plans, provide for expansion. Location of the refuse will have to be verified for methane gas, The &gineer sug�- eested a joint meeting with those departments that will utilize the building and the City Council, Bid openings are tentatively scheduled for the first part of October with work beginning around November 1, City vehicles may be stored there over the winters but the site will not be completed until spring, support from the Tri—Lakes area# for manning this station will be sougb,t, Wes,Hendriksont T10A architect and planner# will be meeting with the Council on this building. Morgan stated the decision on earth sheltered vs non —earth sheltered could be determined by the Building Committee# specifications will demand full Council attention, SPECIAL MEETING: August 1# 19799 Wednesday# 8:30 a,m,# has been set for an all day Council meeting, The Administrator will prepare an agenda, C, Iiar Drivewa — Fill for the driveway is available on —site. The concrete foundation will be suitable for the foot bri.dge. It will need railings and a wooden deck. Mr, and Mrs. Nelson questioned how the City would handle the drainage Problem through their property if the County does not take their Property, If this becomes the case the City lhgineer will go out and determine what work will need to be done, The Administrator will con— tact the County and find out what the status of the Nelson property is and contact the Nelsonts,