Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING JULY 8, 1980 -2- <br />LEGION POND: R. Mordick 16051 Quality Ct. - Has lived in Lake Elmo <br />since 1948. Stated when the lake comes up so does the pond. <br />The pond experiences a delayed reaction to the elevation of <br />Lake Elmo. He does not think pumping will solve the problem. <br />Lake Elmo is the highest it has ever been; water has always <br />been in the pond area. He does not feel he would benefit <br />from pumping, he would rather see the water high. <br />A. Henning - 2921 Legion Avenue - Suggests filling the lots <br />and raising the elevation. Councilman Pott stated the <br />Council did consider filling and dredging. It was determined <br />it would take 1,000 yds. of fill per lot. Dredging could <br />raise the pond if the water table is below the pond. <br />J. Renfrew - asked if the pumping of Lake Jane has an effect <br />on Lake Elmo. None has been noted by Valley Branch. <br />J. Toft - 2764 Legion Avenue - Stated once the level of the <br />pond is controlled the residents on Legion plan to fill their <br />yards, possibly construct a retaining wall and repair their <br />septic systems. They do plan to help themselves once the <br />pond level is reduced. They have tried filling in the past, <br />but it has been washed away. <br />D. Durand - His family has been in Lake Elmo since 1938. The <br />water has never been this high. Since 1975 when the water <br />started coming up he has lost 200 ft. of frontage. <br />E. Goerss - Feels filling in the lots is a bad idea. His <br />property is on the south end of the pond and feels filling <br />will only transfer the water from one property to another. <br />If the residents on Legion Avenue are allowed to fill and <br />flood his property he should have the same right to fill his <br />land, thus displacing the water onto other land. This should <br />be considered. <br />Pott stated that there is no inexpensive way to drain this area <br />by gravity. Property to the north is not large enough to <br />store the 70 acre feet of water. He also explained that the'City's <br />Lake Level Control Policy will allow the City to control the <br />level of Lake Elmo at the outlet. <br />Mayor Armstrong asked for a show of hands from residents that <br />favor test borings. (These borings would be assessed to the <br />benefitted properties.) <br />D. Collyard -- 2814 Legion Avenue - Feels every opinion expressed <br />is right. He feels the City should lend a hand in paying for <br />resolving this problem as he feels they�,are at;;the end of the <br />water pumped from Lake Jane. <br />P.ayor Armstrong cited the City Councils policy for using General <br />Revenue Funds to subsidize individual projects that are not <br />City wide. The Lake Jane pumping was assessed out to the <br />benefitting property owners, as so should this project. <br />COUNT: 16 property owners are in favor of drilling test wells; <br />4 are against the wells; and, 7 are opposed to both the test <br />wells and the.pumping. <br />West Lakeland Resident - opposes any pumping into Lake Elmo. <br />They have expended $7,OOO,to date,resolving their own water <br />problems and feel any pumping into Lake Elmo would aggravate <br />their problem. <br />Armstrong stated,that should pumping or dredging prove not <br />feasible, the City has the authority to sub,idize a program at <br />a low interest rate,which would allow the home owners to do <br />the necessary improvements (fill or raise the homes). This <br />would be payable twice a year on the home owners tax statement. <br />Mayor Armstrong closed the hearing at 8:45 p.m. <br />