11-16-82 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CITY COUNCIL MEETING, NOVEMBER 16, 1982 8. ENGINEER°S REPORT: A.— Keats Avenue Up'�Date- Bohrer reported that the contractor has completed the list of required work, as presented by the Engineer November 3. Because of the weather,no additional work was started on the final top coat of asphalt;to complete the contract, The Engineer recommended approving the contractor's request to extend the completion date of the contract to June 15, 1983. If this is granted, he recommended that it be made clear to the contractor that this is.the final extension and if work is not completed by the date the�City will enforce the penalties provided in the contract. Bohrer also noted that the driveway work will be completed this week. A letter to this effect has been sent to all affected property owners. M/S/P Mottaz/Novak to extend the completion date of the Keats Avenue Project to June 15, 1982, With the stipulation that all contracted work will be completed by this date otherwise contract penalties will be enforced. Carried 5-0. 9. ENRIGHT REZONING REQUEST: Planning Commission member Bob Dreher informed the Council that the area proposed for the house is very low and swampy. --Dave Johnson, Conn -Co Shoes said he spoke with Mr. Enright and that he indicated he would not attend the Council meeting and was aware his request would be likely be denied. --Whittaker - the house Mr. Enright proposes to move is on an existing conforming parcel - why move it to a non -conforming lot. The Council then reviewed the Planning Commission recommendation to -deny the rezoning and house moving permit. M/S/P Eder/Novak to deny the rezoning and house moving request of C. R. Enright,based on the recommendation of the ;planning Commission,for the following reasons: 1. The rezoning to R-1 is in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan for use in Section 32. 2. The proposed R-h zoning would not be adjacent to any other R-1 zone in the City, thereby, creating spot zoning. 3. The lot size would not meet the minimum requirement of 1 1/2A. Carried 5-0. 10. DAVE JOHNSON - PLANNING IN SECTION 32: Mr, Johnson apprised the Council that a group oS_property.•:Qwners;..in Section 32 have been meeting to discuss the proposed Waste Energy plant and its effect-on.the surrounding property owners and their land -use. _He indicated: that;the.group-is satisified with the access for the plant and have agreed this is the direction they would like to see pursued. The group would favor an energy park and if the City.is interested in this, they would be willing to work with the Council in sharing ideas and developing plans for the utilization of the property in the area. --Mottaz - previewed a joint meeting between the City, County and the consulting engineers for the plant regarding an energy park. He indicated that the County is interested in getting involved with this type of development and encouraged participation - df-the-Section 32'property owners .