02-21-84 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 2-21-84 PAGE 4 Bohrer said it was difficult to determine this because the sketch doesn't list the proposed floor elevations of the house and garage. It doesn't show the proposed grading, or how the area around the house is going to be shaped to fit it. M/S/P Fraser/Mazzara - To recommend that the Shoreland Permit be denied until such time as the applicant revises the site plan to meet the building setback or demonstrates the hardship. In addition, the septic system design should be revised to show 953 SP of drainfield trench area. The site plan should also be revised to show basement floor elevation and final grading contours. (Motion carried (4-1 <Morgan>) Fraser stated that even given this, she may not vote in favor of this variance based on the recommendation of the DNR, and does not want to raise false hopes. M/S/P Morgan/Dunn - If the Johnson's can demonstrate hardship, or presents a plan that shows the requirements as laid out by the Engineer, the City Council would not deny the request based on the lot size. (Motion carried 5-0) C. Robert Mogren: Shoreland permit for deck addition at 8738 Lake Jane Trail . Mr. Mogren plans to add onto an existing deck and enclose it for three -season use to his home. The existing house elevation is approximately 934, well above the flood level. The new addition to the deck will place the structure approximately 130 feet from the OHWM where only 100 feet is required. Since no bedrooms are being added, a septic system evaluation is not required. The proposed work meets all of the requirements of the Shoreland Ordinance. M/S/P Mazzara/Morgan - To approve the shoreland application for a deck extension for Robert Mogren at 8738 Lake Jane Trail. (Motion carried 5-0) d. MSA Discussion Bohrer presented the Feasibility Report on improvements of 45th Street, Julep Avenue and 47th Street from Jane Road North to Keats Avenue to the Council. Bohrer stated that right now it looks like the amount of assessment to each lot (depending on how many lots are assessed) is from $340 to $420, but recommends proposed assessments at approximately the same rate as Keats Avenue, about $750 per lot, because of the unknown nature of the legal and court costs at this point. Bohrer asked the council's opinion on how the Morris Addition should be assessed. There are lots in this addition that do not abut the road. How does the council feel on the proposed assessment per lot? Should we use the actual estimated amount of $340 to $420 or should we use assume it is about the same as Keats Avenue and go into the hearing with about $750 per lot?