My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-02-84 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1980's
>
1984
>
10-02-84 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2025 8:08:40 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:03:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 10-2-84 PAGE 10 <br />There were no residents present to speak for or against this proposal, <br />and the public hearing was closed at 9:55 p.m. <br />The Council reviewed the report from the City Engineer dated September <br />27, 1984. The report addresses: (1) Lot Size - The lot size is 1.0 <br />acres where 2.0 acres is required for a natural environment lake. (2) <br />House Elevation - The basement floor elevation is proposed to be 895 <br />(1' above 100 year flood) where 897 (3' above 100 year flood) is <br />required. (3) House Setback from Water - The house exceeds the 200' <br />setback requirement. (4) Septic System Elevation - The applicant <br />requests that elevation 894 be allowed where 897 (3' above 100 year <br />flood) is required. (5) Well Location - The well location meets all <br />setback requirements but is proposed to be located 30 feet from the <br />east property line. (6) Septic System Design - No soil boring or <br />percolation tests have been performed, therefore he could not evaluate <br />any proposed system. <br />He further stated that the variances for lot size and building <br />elevation are reasonable and consistent with past Council action with <br />other lots in Eden Park 2nd Addition. He is, however, reluctant to <br />recommend any minimum drainfield elevation until proper soil tests are <br />conducted. He also recommended that the well be placed 40 feet from <br />the east property line so as not to impact any septic system placement <br />on undeveloped Lot 9• He further stated that it would be appropriate <br />to grant variance for lot size and building elevation but condi'Yon the <br />variance for drainfield elevation upon satisfactory compliance with <br />the Septic System Ordinance. <br />M/S/P Fraser/Eder To grant shoreland permit and variance for lot <br />size and building elevation but condition the variance for drainfield <br />elevation upon satisfactory compliance with the Septic System <br />Ordinance for Steve Howell at Lot 8, Block 1 Eden Park 2nd Addition. <br />(Motion carried 4-0). <br />K. Other <br />The Engineer stated regarding the right -of -entry and waiver of <br />trespass that was obtained from Myrtle Eder and the Berschen's for <br />constructing the MSA improvements, that one of the conditions that was <br />requested of Mrs. Eder and the Berschen's and tacked on to the <br />right -of -entry agreement by the City Attorney was that the City vacate <br />the unused portions of the road, prior to or by October 1, 1984. He <br />contacted the attorney to find out what significance that date held <br />because if that were very important, the Council would have to take <br />action at this meeting. The Attorney did not get back to the <br />Engineer, so he was simply making the Council aware of this deadline. <br />The Engineer felt January 1, 1985 would be an appropriate date and has <br />every intention in doing this by January 1, 1985. <br />6. City Council Reports <br />A. Association of Metropolitan Municipalities - Fraser <br />Fraser stated that each year the City looks at the feasibility of <br />joining the AMM. She feels that most people in city government in the <br />metropolitan area have concerns that the Met Council tends to spend <br />A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.