My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-07-84 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1980's
>
1984
>
11-07-84 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2025 8:08:40 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:03:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ll-'7-tall PAGE 5 <br />Lake Olson is three inches above its normal level, it seems like there <br />is a double standard being applied. Maybe the no -wake ordinance <br />should not apply to Lakes Olson and DeMontreville at the proposed <br />level. <br />Mr. Rowe stated the City is way out of line with the 930.25 level, it <br />should be a lot lower. He further recommended that the height be set <br />higher with the condition that no sandbags are used to create that <br />height. Set the level at 931 without sandbags used to artifically <br />raise the level, and then say that the slow no -wake restriction is in <br />effect. <br />Dick Murray explained that, in visualizing the weir as a dam, the top <br />of the weir is at elevation 929•85 feet. Last ,year, at the time when <br />the sandbags were placed on the weir, the water was approximately four <br />inches above the top of the weir. That was the time that the VBWD <br />Board determined that it was in the best interest to place the <br />sandbags. It was also the .level that the lake was at; when the City <br />Council imposed a ban on boating, That ban was put on at the request <br />of the people who lived on the lake. The wording that was put into <br />the ban that the City Council approved was that there would be no <br />boating when the lake was above elevation 930 feet, which only allowed <br />about 1/2 inch of water to be flowing over the top of the weir when <br />you had a no boating restriction. The City Council. is now proposing <br />to change the wording of that Resolution to allow boating when the <br />lake is at 930.25, about four inches above the top of the weir. The <br />discussion about the hole in the weir is to place a hole 1-1/2 feet <br />below the top of the weir which would bleed the water off of Lakes <br />Olson and DeMontreville with the hopes of getting rid of it down on <br />Lake Jane. That possibility is still pending, it is part of the 509 <br />Plan and VBWD is hoping to implement it. <br />Mazzara asked if it was not true last year when the sandbags were put <br />on, they wanted "x" amount of acre feet to store water because it <br />could not have been handled on a pump in Lake Jane. <br />Mr. Murray responded that the placement of the sandbags was to buy <br />about weeks time so that a diesel pump could be put into Lake Jane. <br />An overflow level. of 930.25 is not uncommon on Lakes Olson and <br />DeMontreville. The summer rains that we had this year put those lakes <br />up to that level in a matter of days. They would have stayed at those <br />levels for several days without any more rainfall, just because of the <br />inflow of water from upstream. <br />Mazzara asked how close we are to getting the eight inch hole in the <br />weir, and what are the problems. <br />Murray responded that the problems are VBWD has to submit this plan <br />for review by all of the cities in the watershed district. The final <br />approval comes from the County and any implementation is the <br />responsibility of the Watershed Board. VBWD is at the point where <br />they are going to present their plans - they should be out within a <br />week or so. The approval of the 509 Plan is contingent upon DNR <br />approval as far as what lake levels can be utilize. The DNR has given <br />the VBWD preliminary approval to put an eight inch hole in the weir on <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.