Laserfiche WebLink
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 5-7-85 PAGE 9 <br />D. City Employees <br />1. Maintenance Foreman <br />The Council discussed the four canidates that were interviewed prior <br />to this meeting and the following action was taken. <br />M/S/P Mazzara/Armstrong - To hire Dan Olinger as the Lake Elmo <br />Maintenance Foreman. (Motion carried 4-0-1 <Morgan>) <br />M/S/P Armstrong/Mazzara - To pay Dan Olinger $24,330 for the first <br />six months of his employment and after successfully completing his <br />probabitionary period to increase this pay to $25,546. (Motion <br />carried 5-0) <br />2. Administrative Secretary <br />M/S/P Mazzara/Morgan - To approve the hiring of Sharon Lumby as the <br />Administrative Secretary at the rate of $6.80 per hour with an <br />increase to $7.14 per hour after succussfully completing her six month <br />probationary period. (Motion carried 5-0) <br />3. Planning Commission Secretary <br />Dunn questioned the need for this additional person as up to now the <br />City has only had 2 full time employees and 1 part time employee. <br />With the hiring of the new administrative secretary and a planning <br />commission secretary, the City would be increasing its staff to 3 full <br />time and 1 part time. <br />The administrator stated that the work load has increased greatly and <br />by hiring this extra person, the planning commission minutes would be <br />done in a more timely fashion. <br />Morgan/Armstrong - To table the hiring a planning commission secretary <br />until the administrative secretary is on board to see if there is <br />indeed a need for this additional person. (Motion carried 5-0) <br />M/S/P Mazzara/Christ - To extend the meeting until 10:50 p.m. <br />(Motion carried 5-0) <br />E. Other <br />1. Meed Employee <br />M/S/P Christ/Mazzara - To employ a MEED employee through Washington <br />County subject to the applicant meeting the approval.of the City <br />Administrator and Maintenance Foreman. (Motion carried 5-0) <br />2. Lake Rules <br />There is a conflict between the wording for lake rules that was <br />discussed at the last meeting and the wording that the DNR will <br />accept. Something will have to be worked out to clarify these rules <br />and will be brought back to the Council at a later date. <br />