My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-04-86 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1980's
>
1986
>
03-04-86 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2025 7:53:26 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:08:18 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 4, 1986 PAGE 2 <br />are necessary for this parcel and it meets the policies and the <br />goals for Rural Residential that have been set up in the <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />Todd Williams, 3025 Lake Elmo Ave. - I oppose the rezoning because <br />the Palzers knew it was zoned Ag when they purchased it. The <br />Comprehensive Plan calls for preserving land in Ag zoning whenever <br />possible and for as long as possible because of the demand for <br />urban services which, Williams feels, more intense development <br />always brings. The Comprehensive Plan was designed to help stage <br />development properly so that "leap frog" development and spot <br />zoning does not occur. There are already 200 residential lots in <br />the City which are available for building, and it is only good <br />sense to direct new residential building to these areas and not to <br />start another isolated cluster of homes. <br />Mr. Bannigan responded to Mr. William's statements by pointing out <br />that to deny an application there must be findings of fact, for <br />which there must be a rational basis. Also, the property owner <br />has the right to get the highest and best use of his land. <br />Bannigan feels the Palzer's meet the conditions the City sets <br />forth in its performance standard and the City must have <br />overriding reasons to deny the application. <br />Councilwoman Armstrong stated that the burden is on the landowner <br />to show a mistake in the original zoning or that the character of <br />the neighborhood has changed to such an extent that no reasonable <br />use can be made of the property in its present zoning <br />classification. The Palzers knew that this was zoned agricultural <br />when they purchased it and reasonable use of this land may <br />continue as it has been used. The character of the neighborhood is <br />rural and agricultural and the neighbors rely on this zoning <br />remaining unchanged, and Lake Elmo's policy has been to preserve <br />open spaces and prevent "leap frog" development. The City has <br />sufficient lots to accomodate building in the more developed areas <br />of Lake Elmo and seven houses on a cul-de-sac would change the <br />character of the neighborhood and require additional city services <br />such as snowplowing. <br />Councilman Mazzara felt that the Palzer's plan conforms to the <br />City Code which would allow a cluster development of seven lots <br />per forty acres, and out of this forty acres 28.6 acres would <br />remain open. The intent of the Comprehensive Plan is still being <br />met by keeping at least 28 acres open. <br />M/S/P Armstrong/Dunn to deny a request from A.M. and Paul Palzer <br />for rezoning a 40 acre parcel of land located on Keats Avenue from <br />Agricultural to Rural Residential based on the reasons stated. <br />(Motion carried 3-2<Ma.zzara, Morgan: based on the soils not being <br />prime agricultural land>). <br />B. Public Hearing : Proposed Interim Ordinance <br />for a Temporary Moratorium on Development. <br />Mayor Morgan opened up the public hearing at 7:30 p.m. in the City <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.