08-16-88 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 16, 1988 PAGE 5 (...providing for the construction of all streets and related improvement to City Standard to be completed within one year,) M/S/P Armstrong/Johnson - resolved that the Council hereby adopts Resolution No. 88-36, as amended, for approval of the Final Plat of Brookman 3rd Addition; contingent upon the developer meeting conditions specified in the City Engineer's letter of 8-11-88; upon providing a letter of credit and an acceptable Developer's agreement; upon payment of park dedication fees and pass-thru costs. Bruce Folz stated that when the land was donated for the new City Hall, the City waived all park dedication fees on the Brookman Addition. The City Staff will check into this and will have the Parks Commission discuss the possibility of increasing the park dedication fees. The Council requested the developer provide an appraised market value of the property. M/S/P Moe/Johnson - to amend the motion to exclude the park dedication fee because of their donation of land to the City for the new City Hall. (Motion carried 3-1<Armstrong>). M/S/P Moe/Johnson - resolved that the City Council hereby adopts Resolution No. 88-36, as amended, for approval of the Final Plat of Brookman 3rd Addition; contingent upon the developer meeting conditions specified in the City Engineer's letter of 8-11-88; upon providing a letter of credit and an acceptable Developer's Agreement, upon payment of pass-thru costs; and to exclude the park dedication fee because of their donation of land to the City for the new City Hall. (Motion carried 3-1-0<Abstain: Armstrong>). E. Request to Revoke our 87-29 Resolution: Jim Friedrich In March of 1985, the City Council granted a road frontage variance to Joseph Kaiser which enabled him to build a single family residential unit. In June of 1987, Jim Friedrich applied for, and was granted, a simple lot subdivision with the intention of selling the parcel split to Mr. Kaiser. Mr. Friedrich has advised the City that the sale to Mr. Kaiser never went thru. In fact, Mr.. Kaiser never finished his house and it is now on the market. However, the resolution granting this lot split was recorded with Washington County and the parcel split off from the Friedrich property now shows to be part of the Kaiser property --which would be correct had the sale gone through. Mr. Friedrich has asked that this resolution be revoked so that the County's legal description will show the parcel belongs to him and not Mr. Kaiser. Mr. Friedrich has also asked that this parcel be shown as a separate parcel rather than combining it with his parcel, as was the case originally. Mr. Friedrich would like to be able to sell this parcel as a separate building site, provided it meets all code requirements for septic, setback, etc. Mr. Friedrich and the person who is interested in purchasing the existing Kaiser house would eliminate the private road access to the property over Mr. Friedrich's property and propose to enter off of Stillwater Blvd. as do the other homes in the area.