01-03-89 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 3, 1989 PAGE 9 ( 1.1. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: A. Resolution 89-3: Resolution Opposing Detachment/Annexation of I-94 Properties. A Resolution was provided for Council's review opposing detachment/annexation of I-94 properties (from C.R. 1.3 East to C.R. 15; 1./2 mile North) from Lake Elmo for annexation to Woodbury. Councilman Williams suggested, in Resolution 89-3, deletion of paragraph directing the staff and consultants to gather evidence necessary to oppose said petitions because he felt the City should not spend any time or money until the petition has been filed. He asked that the City Attorney reword the resolution in order to maximize the effect on the Municipal Board. M/S/P Williams/hunt - to direct the City Staff and City Attorney to reword. Resolution 89-3 in order to maximize the effect before the Municipal Board and come back with a draft for Council's review at the January 17th meeting. (Motion carried 4-0). B. City Council and Planning Commission Resol.ut•ions (89-4 - 89-10) Resolutions of Appreciation to Mayor Arlyn Christ, Council.members Rose Armstrong and Dick Johnson, as well. as Resolutions of Appreciation to Planning Commission Members Lee Hunt, Marge Williams, Tom Simpson and Parks Commission member Ron Ramirez were presented for formal action; for presentation to recipients at the January 13th Christmas Party. M/S/P Moe/Hunt - resolved that Resolution Nos. 89-4 thru 89-10, being Resolutions of Appreciations of service rendered to the City, are hereby approved. M/S/P Williams/Hunt - to amend the above motion to include change in Resolutions 89-4 (replace words perception and understanding with dedication and contribution to). Motion carried 4-0). M/S/P Moe/Bunt - resolved that Resolution Nos. 89-4 thru 89-10, being Resolutions of Appreciation of service rendered to the City; to include the approved amendment to Resolution 89-4, are hereby approved. (Motion carried4-0=1'Abstain: Hunt abstained from voting on Resolution 89-7 thanking him for his contribution to the City). C. Administrator's Employment Contract As discussed at a previous meeting, City Administrator Morrison has pepared a proposed Employment Contract and has sent the contract to the City Atorney for his review. Because of insuf.ficent time to review the contract, the Council made the following motion: M/S/P Moe/Williams - to postpone review of the City Administrator's Employemnt Contract until the January 17th City Council meeting. (Motion carried 4-0).